* [PATCH v3 0/1] fs/writeback: skip AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mappings in wait_sb_inodes()
@ 2026-01-05 21:17 Joanne Koong
2026-01-05 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Joanne Koong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joanne Koong @ 2026-01-05 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: david, miklos, linux-mm, athul.krishna.kr, j.neuschaefer, carnil,
linux-fsdevel, stable
This patch adds a new mapping flag AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY which signifies that a
mapping does not have data integrity guarantees, and skips waiting on writeout
for these mappings in wait_sb_inodes(), as these mappings cannot guarantee
that data is persistently stored. This patch sets this flag on fuse mappings.
This fixes the userspace regression reported by Athul and J. upstream in
[1][2] where if there is a bug in a fuse server that causes the server to
never complete writeback, it will make wait_sb_inodes() wait forever.
Thanks,
Joanne
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/CAJnrk1ZjQ8W8NzojsvJPRXiv9TuYPNdj8Ye7=Cgkj=iV_i8EaA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aT7JRqhUvZvfUQlV@eldamar.lan/
Changelog:
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251215030043.1431306-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
* Add comments to commit message (David) and to wait_sb_inodes() (Andrew)
* Add Bernd's Reviewed-by and J's Tested-by
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251120184211.2379439-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
* Change AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_HANG to AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY and keep
AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM as is.
Joanne Koong (1):
fs/writeback: skip AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mappings in wait_sb_inodes()
fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++++++-
fs/fuse/file.c | 4 +++-
include/linux/pagemap.h | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/1] fs/writeback: skip AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mappings in wait_sb_inodes()
2026-01-05 21:17 [PATCH v3 0/1] fs/writeback: skip AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mappings in wait_sb_inodes() Joanne Koong
@ 2026-01-05 21:17 ` Joanne Koong
2026-01-06 1:48 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joanne Koong @ 2026-01-05 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: david, miklos, linux-mm, athul.krishna.kr, j.neuschaefer, carnil,
linux-fsdevel, stable, Bernd Schubert
Above the while() loop in wait_sb_inodes(), we document that we must
wait for all pages under writeback for data integrity. Consequently, if
a mapping, like fuse, traditionally does not have data integrity
semantics, there is no need to wait at all; we can simply skip these
inodes.
This restores fuse back to prior behavior where syncs are no-ops. This
fixes a user regression where if a system is running a faulty fuse
server that does not reply to issued write requests, this causes
wait_sb_inodes() to wait forever.
Fixes: 0c58a97f919c ("fuse: remove tmp folio for writebacks and internal rb tree")
Reported-by: Athul Krishna <athul.krishna.kr@protonmail.com>
Reported-by: J. Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
Tested-by: J. Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++++++-
fs/fuse/file.c | 4 +++-
include/linux/pagemap.h | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 6800886c4d10..baa2f2141146 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -2750,8 +2750,13 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
* The mapping can appear untagged while still on-list since we
* do not have the mapping lock. Skip it here, wb completion
* will remove it.
+ *
+ * If the mapping does not have data integrity semantics,
+ * there's no need to wait for the writeout to complete, as the
+ * mapping cannot guarantee that data is persistently stored.
*/
- if (!mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK))
+ if (!mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK) ||
+ mapping_no_data_integrity(mapping))
continue;
spin_unlock_irq(&sb->s_inode_wblist_lock);
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 01bc894e9c2b..3b2a171e652f 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -3200,8 +3200,10 @@ void fuse_init_file_inode(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags)
inode->i_fop = &fuse_file_operations;
inode->i_data.a_ops = &fuse_file_aops;
- if (fc->writeback_cache)
+ if (fc->writeback_cache) {
mapping_set_writeback_may_deadlock_on_reclaim(&inode->i_data);
+ mapping_set_no_data_integrity(&inode->i_data);
+ }
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->write_files);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->queued_writes);
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 31a848485ad9..ec442af3f886 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ enum mapping_flags {
AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM = 9,
AS_KERNEL_FILE = 10, /* mapping for a fake kernel file that shouldn't
account usage to user cgroups */
+ AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY = 11, /* no data integrity guarantees */
/* Bits 16-25 are used for FOLIO_ORDER */
AS_FOLIO_ORDER_BITS = 5,
AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN = 16,
@@ -345,6 +346,16 @@ static inline bool mapping_writeback_may_deadlock_on_reclaim(const struct addres
return test_bit(AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM, &mapping->flags);
}
+static inline void mapping_set_no_data_integrity(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ set_bit(AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY, &mapping->flags);
+}
+
+static inline bool mapping_no_data_integrity(const struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ return test_bit(AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY, &mapping->flags);
+}
+
static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_mask(const struct address_space *mapping)
{
return mapping->gfp_mask;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] fs/writeback: skip AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mappings in wait_sb_inodes()
2026-01-05 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Joanne Koong
@ 2026-01-06 1:48 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-01-06 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joanne Koong
Cc: david, miklos, linux-mm, athul.krishna.kr, j.neuschaefer, carnil,
linux-fsdevel, stable, Bernd Schubert
On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:17:27 -0800 Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> wrote:
> Above the while() loop in wait_sb_inodes(), we document that we must
> wait for all pages under writeback for data integrity. Consequently, if
> a mapping, like fuse, traditionally does not have data integrity
> semantics, there is no need to wait at all; we can simply skip these
> inodes.
>
> This restores fuse back to prior behavior where syncs are no-ops. This
> fixes a user regression where if a system is running a faulty fuse
> server that does not reply to issued write requests, this causes
> wait_sb_inodes() to wait forever.
>
> Fixes: 0c58a97f919c ("fuse: remove tmp folio for writebacks and internal rb tree")
> Reported-by: Athul Krishna <athul.krishna.kr@protonmail.com>
> Reported-by: J. Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
> Tested-by: J. Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Thanks.
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++++++-
> fs/fuse/file.c | 4 +++-
> include/linux/pagemap.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I'll queue this in mm.git's mm-hotfixes branches for a 6.19-rcX merge.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-06 1:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-05 21:17 [PATCH v3 0/1] fs/writeback: skip AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mappings in wait_sb_inodes() Joanne Koong
2026-01-05 21:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Joanne Koong
2026-01-06 1:48 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox