Re: [PATCH 00/28] arch, mm: consolidate hugetlb early reservation

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 14:39:30 +0200 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:

> Order in which early memory reservation for hugetlb happens depends on
> architecture, on configuration options and on command line parameters.
> 
> Some architectures rely on the core MM to call hugetlb_bootmem_alloc()
> while others call it very early to allow pre-allocation of HVO-style
> vmemmap.
> 
> When hugetlb_cma is supported by an architecture it is initialized during
> setup_arch() and then later hugetlb_init code needs to understand did it
> happen or not.
> 
> To make everything consistent and unified, both reservation of hugetlb
> memory from bootmem and creation of CMA areas for hugetlb must be called
> from core MM initialization and it would have been a simple change.
> However, HVO-style pre-initialization ordering requirements slightly
> complicate things and for HVO pre-init to work sparse and memory map should
> be initialized after hugetlb reservations.
> 
> This required pulling out the call to free_area_init() out of setup_arch()
> path and moving it MM initialization and this is what the first 23 patches
> do.
> 
> These changes are deliberately split into per-arch patches that change how
> the zone limits are calculated for each architecture and the patches 22 and
> 23 just remove the calls to free_area_init() and sprase_init() from arch/*.
> 
> Patch 24 is a simple cleanup for MIPS.
> 
> Patches 25 and 26 actually consolidate hugetlb reservations and patches 27
> and 28 perform some aftermath cleanups.

Thanks for the diligence - this can't have been the most exciting thing
to work on!

> I tried to trim the distribution list and although it's still quite long
> if you feel that someone was wrongly excluded please add them back.

I'll add these to mm.git's mm-new branch for some testing.  I'll
suppress the usual email storm because 41 * 28 is a lot of emails ;)