linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	"# 6 . 14 . x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/damon/core: remove call_control in inactive contexts
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 10:31:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251228183105.289441-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)

If damon_call() is executed against a DAMON context that is not running,
the function returns error while keeping the damon_call_control object
linked to the context's call_controls list.  Let's suppose the object is
deallocated after the damon_call(), and yet another damon_call() is
executed against the same context.  The function tries to add the new
damon_call_control object to the call_controls list, which still has the
pointer to the previous damon_call_control object, which is deallocated.
As a result, use-after-free happens.

This can actually be triggered using the DAMON sysfs interface.  It is
not easily exploitable since it requires the sysfs write permission and
making a definitely weird file writes, though.  Please refer to the
report for more details about the issue reproduction steps.

Fix the issue by making damon_call() to cleanup the damon_call_control
object before returning the error.

Reported-by: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/20251224094401.20384-1-rgbi3307@gmail.com
Fixes: 42b7491af14c ("mm/damon/core: introduce damon_call()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14.x
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
 mm/damon/core.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index 2d3e8006db50..65482a0ce20b 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -1442,6 +1442,35 @@ bool damon_is_running(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
 	return running;
 }
 
+/*
+ * damon_call_handle_inactive_ctx() - handle DAMON call request that added to
+ *				      an inactive context.
+ * @ctx:	The inactive DAMON context.
+ * @control:	Control variable of the call request.
+ *
+ * This function is called in a case that @control is added to @ctx but @ctx is
+ * not running (inactive).  See if @ctx handled @control or not, and cleanup
+ * @control if it was not handled.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if @control was handled by @ctx, negative error code otherwise.
+ */
+static int damon_call_handle_inactive_ctx(
+		struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_call_control *control)
+{
+	struct damon_call_control *c;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(c, &ctx->call_controls, list) {
+		if (c == control) {
+			list_del(&control->list);
+			mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * damon_call() - Invoke a given function on DAMON worker thread (kdamond).
  * @ctx:	DAMON context to call the function for.
@@ -1472,7 +1501,7 @@ int damon_call(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_call_control *control)
 	list_add_tail(&control->list, &ctx->call_controls);
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
 	if (!damon_is_running(ctx))
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return damon_call_handle_inactive_ctx(ctx, control);
 	if (control->repeat)
 		return 0;
 	wait_for_completion(&control->completion);

base-commit: a100272b3541cb00a5e29fdc16e428234ebfddd1
-- 
2.47.3


             reply	other threads:[~2025-12-28 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-28 18:31 SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-12-30  1:45 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-30  2:41   ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-30  3:45     ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-31  1:25       ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-31  5:27         ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-31 15:26           ` SeongJae Park
2026-01-01  0:55             ` JaeJoon Jung
2026-01-01  1:41               ` SeongJae Park
2026-01-01  2:58                 ` JaeJoon Jung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251228183105.289441-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rgbi3307@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox