From: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@gmail.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@gmail.com>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, rgbi3307@nate.com
Subject: [PATCH] mm/damon/core: modified control->repeat loop at the kdamond_call()
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 21:43:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224124355.31667-1-rgbi3307@gmail.com> (raw)
The kdamond_call() function is executed repeatedly in the kdamond_fn()
kernel thread. The kdamond_call() function is implemented as a while loop.
Therefore, it is important to improve the list processing logic here to
ensure faster execution of control->fn(). For ease of explanation,
the data structure names will be abbreviated as follows:
damon_call_control.list: C.list
ctx->call_controls: CTX.head
repeat_controls: R.head
the execution flow of the while loop of the kdamond_call() function,
Before modification:
Old while loop:
CTX.head <-----> C.list <-----> C.list <----> C.list
^ | |
| if (C.repeat) if (!C.repeat)
restore: only one | |
list_add_tail() list_del() list_del()
| | |
+ | complete()
R.head <------ list_add()
To process C.repeat above, we use an additional list, repeat_controls.
The process of adding C.list to repeat_controls and then restoring it back
to CTX.head is complex and inefficient. Furthermore, there's the problem
of restoring only a single C.list to CTX.head.
Below, repeat_controls is removed and the existing CTX.head is modified to
loop once(1st rotation). This simplifies list processing and creates a
more efficient structure.
Modified while loop:
Not used repeat_controls:
CTX.head <-----> C.list <-----> C.list <----> C.list <-------+
| | |
if (C.repeat) if (!C.repeat) |
| | |
list_del() list_del() |
| | |
| complete() |
| |
first --------> list_add_tail() -----------+
if (C.list == first) break;
Signed-off-by: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@gmail.com>
---
mm/damon/core.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index 824aa8f22db3..babad37719b6 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -2554,42 +2554,43 @@ static void kdamond_usleep(unsigned long usecs)
*/
static void kdamond_call(struct damon_ctx *ctx, bool cancel)
{
- struct damon_call_control *control;
- LIST_HEAD(repeat_controls);
- int ret = 0;
+ struct damon_call_control *control, *first = NULL;
+ unsigned int idx = 0;
while (true) {
mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
control = list_first_entry_or_null(&ctx->call_controls,
struct damon_call_control, list);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
- if (!control)
+
+ /* check control empty or 1st rotation */
+ if (!control || control == first)
break;
- if (cancel) {
+
+ if (++idx == 1)
+ first = control;
+
+ if (cancel)
control->canceled = true;
- } else {
- ret = control->fn(control->data);
- control->return_code = ret;
- }
+ else
+ control->return_code = control->fn(control->data);
+
mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
list_del(&control->list);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
+
if (!control->repeat) {
+ /* run control->fn() one time */
complete(&control->completion);
} else if (control->canceled && control->dealloc_on_cancel) {
kfree(control);
- continue;
} else {
- list_add(&control->list, &repeat_controls);
+ /* to repeat next time */
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&control->list, &ctx->call_controls);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
}
}
- control = list_first_entry_or_null(&repeat_controls,
- struct damon_call_control, list);
- if (!control || cancel)
- return;
- mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
- list_add_tail(&control->list, &ctx->call_controls);
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
}
/* Returns negative error code if it's not activated but should return */
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-24 12:43 JaeJoon Jung [this message]
2025-12-25 1:07 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-25 3:10 ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-25 20:00 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-26 2:19 ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-26 18:31 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-26 23:42 ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-30 0:14 ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-30 0:57 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-31 1:28 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-31 6:23 ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-31 15:29 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251224124355.31667-1-rgbi3307@gmail.com \
--to=rgbi3307@gmail.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rgbi3307@nate.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox