linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
	yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
	mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 6/7] mm/mglru: combine shrink_many into shrink_node_memcgs
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:30:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224073032.161911-7-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224073032.161911-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>

From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>

This patch adds the lru_gen_should_abort_scan check to shrink_node_memcgs
(which is only meaningful for gen-LRU root reclaim). After this change,
shrink_node_memcgs can be used directly instead of shrink_many, allowing
shrink_many to be safely removed.

Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 60 +++++++++++------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 3a266f6456af..1d13ce7338b4 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4777,45 +4777,6 @@ static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
 }
 
-static void shrink_many(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
-{
-	struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
-	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = {
-		.pgdat = pgdat,
-	};
-	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie *partial = &reclaim;
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-
-	if (current_is_kswapd() || sc->memcg_full_walk)
-		partial = NULL;
-
-	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, NULL, partial);
-	do {
-		struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
-
-		cond_resched();
-
-		mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(target_memcg, memcg);
-
-		if (mem_cgroup_below_min(target_memcg, memcg)) {
-			continue;
-		} else if (mem_cgroup_below_low(target_memcg, memcg)) {
-			if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim) {
-				sc->memcg_low_skipped = 1;
-				continue;
-			}
-			memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
-		}
-
-		shrink_one(lruvec, sc);
-
-		if (lru_gen_should_abort_scan(lruvec, sc)) {
-			mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
-			break;
-		}
-	} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, memcg, partial)));
-}
-
 static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	struct blk_plug plug;
@@ -4844,6 +4805,7 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc
 	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
 }
 
+static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc);
 static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	struct blk_plug plug;
@@ -4873,7 +4835,7 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		shrink_one(&pgdat->__lruvec, sc);
 	else
-		shrink_many(pgdat, sc);
+		shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
 
 	if (current_is_kswapd())
 		sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed;
@@ -5586,11 +5548,6 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 	bool proportional_reclaim;
 	struct blk_plug plug;
 
-	if (lru_gen_enabled() && !root_reclaim(sc)) {
-		lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr);
 
 	/* Record the original scan target for proportional adjustments later */
@@ -5822,8 +5779,10 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 
 		reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
 		scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-
-		shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+		if (lru_gen_enabled())
+			lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+		else
+			shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
 
 		shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
 			    sc->priority);
@@ -5837,7 +5796,12 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 		flush_reclaim_state(sc);
 
 		/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
-		if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
+		if (lru_gen_enabled() && root_reclaim(sc)) {
+			if (lru_gen_should_abort_scan(lruvec, sc)) {
+				mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
+				break;
+			}
+		} else if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
 			mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
 			break;
 		}
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-24  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-24  7:30 [PATCH -next v2 0/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-24  7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/7] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-24  7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-24  7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 3/7] mm/mglru: make calls to flush_reclaim_state() similar for MGLRU and non-MGLRU Chen Ridong
2025-12-24  7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 4/7] mm/mglru: rename should_abort_scan to lru_gen_should_abort_scan Chen Ridong
2025-12-24  7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 5/7] mm/mglru: extend lru_gen_shrink_lruvec to support root reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-24  7:30 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2025-12-24  7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 7/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg disable handling from lru_gen_shrink_node Chen Ridong
2025-12-28  2:02   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-27 17:49 ` [PATCH -next v2 0/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Kairui Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251224073032.161911-7-chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox