From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 6/7] mm/mglru: combine shrink_many into shrink_node_memcgs
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:30:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224073032.161911-7-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224073032.161911-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
This patch adds the lru_gen_should_abort_scan check to shrink_node_memcgs
(which is only meaningful for gen-LRU root reclaim). After this change,
shrink_node_memcgs can be used directly instead of shrink_many, allowing
shrink_many to be safely removed.
Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 60 +++++++++++------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 3a266f6456af..1d13ce7338b4 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4777,45 +4777,6 @@ static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
flush_reclaim_state(sc);
}
-static void shrink_many(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
-{
- struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
- struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = {
- .pgdat = pgdat,
- };
- struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie *partial = &reclaim;
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-
- if (current_is_kswapd() || sc->memcg_full_walk)
- partial = NULL;
-
- memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, NULL, partial);
- do {
- struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
-
- cond_resched();
-
- mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(target_memcg, memcg);
-
- if (mem_cgroup_below_min(target_memcg, memcg)) {
- continue;
- } else if (mem_cgroup_below_low(target_memcg, memcg)) {
- if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim) {
- sc->memcg_low_skipped = 1;
- continue;
- }
- memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
- }
-
- shrink_one(lruvec, sc);
-
- if (lru_gen_should_abort_scan(lruvec, sc)) {
- mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
- break;
- }
- } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, memcg, partial)));
-}
-
static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct blk_plug plug;
@@ -4844,6 +4805,7 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
}
+static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc);
static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct blk_plug plug;
@@ -4873,7 +4835,7 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
shrink_one(&pgdat->__lruvec, sc);
else
- shrink_many(pgdat, sc);
+ shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
if (current_is_kswapd())
sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed;
@@ -5586,11 +5548,6 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
bool proportional_reclaim;
struct blk_plug plug;
- if (lru_gen_enabled() && !root_reclaim(sc)) {
- lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
- return;
- }
-
get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr);
/* Record the original scan target for proportional adjustments later */
@@ -5822,8 +5779,10 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-
- shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+ if (lru_gen_enabled())
+ lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+ else
+ shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
sc->priority);
@@ -5837,7 +5796,12 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
flush_reclaim_state(sc);
/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
- if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
+ if (lru_gen_enabled() && root_reclaim(sc)) {
+ if (lru_gen_should_abort_scan(lruvec, sc)) {
+ mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
+ break;
+ }
+ } else if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
break;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-24 7:30 [PATCH -next v2 0/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-24 7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/7] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-24 7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-24 7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 3/7] mm/mglru: make calls to flush_reclaim_state() similar for MGLRU and non-MGLRU Chen Ridong
2025-12-24 7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 4/7] mm/mglru: rename should_abort_scan to lru_gen_should_abort_scan Chen Ridong
2025-12-24 7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 5/7] mm/mglru: extend lru_gen_shrink_lruvec to support root reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-24 7:30 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2025-12-24 7:30 ` [PATCH -next v2 7/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg disable handling from lru_gen_shrink_node Chen Ridong
2025-12-28 2:02 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-27 17:49 ` [PATCH -next v2 0/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Kairui Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251224073032.161911-7-chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox