From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAD21E6B257 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 22:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 27A566B009E; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:19:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 21A646B009F; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:19:22 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 127A06B00A0; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:19:22 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F404F6B009E for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:19:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B48132AB for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 22:19:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84248524122.06.1F73218 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233A3C000C for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 22:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="nafX/XMc"; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1766441959; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=N+XC5YT5cdsj1nRAWBzUZkuED3ebpY8hPxGLJsyURVA=; b=NFUb/BrFVhQOpMR7AymTRiA5ywT8YZqKQEpaUCdzVYFKJl6WER/ZNsXkescuuiFvHppgiU DURbHZafYETv6U62fWAfB6rXLWWnz/TkjEYPFcdbjuD1TbE8zSF4MKehm6QcD8jKmf5hg4 JfB4x7T3ZYmkKiMnmHRVumLCjh4wfyI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="nafX/XMc"; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1766441959; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GAevG/RDWlwqMeWZLTxRATpOhKdPRsNn3zmmpbje+c+x4XxSe1oZUiYQwBqXc/aLh4mkFb GrQDdI1Ly/MpxfS4hvqRubcl8i5w7XQSk8V9yF7JrLthxfZLFTkT74IRm85ev93qMiDOfq zkksuLEa/KIC4Y/O0E+8PoROV3HE1Ko= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766441959; x=1797977959; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=dQ/s5g4Ian6ioHx/lf1wibw3buSKQJjac3nIOVr/Irw=; b=nafX/XMcjWTZvpx12UIJdqTTiBF0JJsyOYtxXYtTzBAQHzQayhn0xnHW +7fwn6qbiRm+U45j2tO4nxsYywU8v/jwsB4Vq8wSN8gz7tnPdUbVfqLt+ GZ7glPH7ClJln6VTH+9+uDwZlrJ1k2HXVIUodoRzJSxFDjXnF4J+6+2ir Vt/imhwLO4CNHpceoi4oiomj6PdFl/xAY6IliXqgbkuzI23t0+WZKJdUl 8IMEJ9wyQm6t28PtHYUmKxDRsR0dkxU2PDSmxNmo9iyR4FeeJLmjfU1vp mWNhz4OZs+D2kNOgBexw++yF/iLQf2PjXCZXYEsAE8YmcoBcrIZDGwCRm w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9o/iWeTNQ+evFmAS1lep7g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QfuWQJdHRyqlHMaHUdX3WQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11650"; a="79017622" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,169,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="79017622" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Dec 2025 14:19:17 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8ZdtjugMTpaUyreTt9B8MA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: w98j602qRNi2vVHfzDgBYQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,169,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="230287947" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO dd3453e2b682) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2025 14:19:13 -0800 Received: from kbuild by dd3453e2b682 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vXoFC-000000001Ap-13Vn; Mon, 22 Dec 2025 22:19:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 06:18:50 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Bing Jiao , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, gourry@gourry.net, longman@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com, david@kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Bing Jiao Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/vmscan: respect mems_effective in demote_folio_list() Message-ID: <202512230655.QvO6dmjt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251221233635.3761887-2-bingjiao@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251221233635.3761887-2-bingjiao@google.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Stat-Signature: ry9w9ttwamu6amcubsd3434zucz7ygzm X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 233A3C000C X-HE-Tag: 1766441958-199363 X-HE-Meta: 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 SDExZp3R VU77XF80ovwZ0JfNf2ltyLZ+aeoSEG0xD6b8dv50CfptjZvg5Jaw16THO6NGF9PV0LSmDhDFAmr+m216xyawwtTVxjECdlF43RafMJjbyW8MY0hriLHGepO/To3Ln31cmNjlbXqyJXWkdKO6sNPes0nb0EM5z15yRSyB2nKehzaw55zxVFv8IRNASPtX0Dq+jM80hIP47ecJJDm/rLf9YRUk4SfMuKPv4kGp/1K60WwWIbTVqyH/iS5F941YFB/0/SP/RyoCU/2kEaZ0Y36mp+C3lAHtA/mXSXFrPcHI3AY4vcOgLmOHicHcg4xdfgfIWl7gRNO+WtfalrWsVm4uLkdpwYIMtCMriieI9RoyqXxeYuh+Mpmo9rNhc/ChQBQQvFJozQgJA6sH/8gscfMypGHcAQG7o7VDX93ALzE0PUC7ZD0MtxEb9RkMiZy2Yoov0rQrft0/6j+5cb08= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Bing, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on tj-cgroup/for-next linus/master v6.19-rc2 next-20251219] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bing-Jiao/mm-vmscan-respect-mems_effective-in-demote_folio_list/20251222-074143 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251221233635.3761887-2-bingjiao%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/vmscan: respect mems_effective in demote_folio_list() config: alpha-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251223/202512230655.QvO6dmjt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251223/202512230655.QvO6dmjt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512230655.QvO6dmjt-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:32, from include/linux/security.h:35, from include/linux/perf_event.h:53, from include/linux/trace_events.h:10, from include/trace/syscall.h:7, from include/linux/syscalls.h:96, from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1, from kernel/sched/sched.h:61, from kernel/sched/rq-offsets.c:5: include/linux/memcontrol.h: In function 'mem_cgroup_filter_mems_allowed': >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:1824:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] 1824 | } | ^ -- In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:32, from include/linux/security.h:35, from include/linux/perf_event.h:53, from include/linux/trace_events.h:10, from include/trace/syscall.h:7, from include/linux/syscalls.h:96, from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1, from kernel/sched/sched.h:61, from kernel/sched/rq-offsets.c:5: include/linux/memcontrol.h: In function 'mem_cgroup_filter_mems_allowed': >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:1824:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] 1824 | } | ^ vim +1824 include/linux/memcontrol.h 1820 1821 static inline bool mem_cgroup_filter_mems_allowed(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, 1822 nodemask_t *mask) 1823 { > 1824 } 1825 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki