[PATCH v2 4/5] selftests/mm: va_high_addr_switch return fail when either test failed

[Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>]

When the first test failed, and the hugetlb test passed, the result would
be pass, but we expect a fail. Fix this issue by returning fail if either
is not KSFT_PASS.

CC: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c
index 02f290a69132..51401e081b20 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int supported_arch(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret, hugetlb_ret = KSFT_PASS;
 
 	if (!supported_arch())
 		return KSFT_SKIP;
@@ -331,6 +331,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	ret = run_test(testcases, sz_testcases);
 	if (argc == 2 && !strcmp(argv[1], "--run-hugetlb"))
-		ret = run_test(hugetlb_testcases, sz_hugetlb_testcases);
-	return ret;
+		hugetlb_ret = run_test(hugetlb_testcases, sz_hugetlb_testcases);
+
+	if (ret == KSFT_PASS && hugetlb_ret == KSFT_PASS)
+		return KSFT_PASS;
+	else
+		return KSFT_FAIL;
 }
-- 
2.49.0