From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA380D637B2 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 03:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D55E06B0088; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:56:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CD9B96B0089; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:56:36 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BE5226B008A; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:56:36 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE46C6B0088 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:56:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F6E13ADEC for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 03:56:36 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84238487592.10.30E549C Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B541520002 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 03:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=LaIl2kAr; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1766202994; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=975gcM7VaENBbW8+sscLr6RUSlbeSAv5QO9rb0RLkJE=; b=CTedoapagNSqO9uPWTnTzodNbAPEY8db4ESbgdh2aWNElih62JcDZQ90znos/0M5RUN1mm VR5Pq/4eDztm5oBkPOvTOTVZ6BEJAlnY+3SaF/PhtCgnx9mQEdeAx+IhK5paNr+znUqdvs 8WCI6w8xg2vApj8q6jewfTx2EY6fsgE= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1766202994; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=vWzJ3xISqv4+V5SaxRbPhw3a6O535chF3MvwHYvybli8zw3WCpNykRUq4V6tt24XmGZizK DwZsSncM3e/9ZSTsBOOLzOd34e3AUYSA04GuP4ZNPKtNyN15A9gCdMdzoya+dedzfj9dNt 04OizVddjrbaIEU23p39diuH7xt+c4o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=LaIl2kAr; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA0960008; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 03:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C220C4CEF5; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 03:56:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766202993; bh=oG2cgaVTel3t5jIQfUWZeyuo3/UdgT5HKmaEXMQCWYI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LaIl2kArlF77GP+jgPiN+nX6JLXC0iriyPbwCGGzaCpAL66tZaMVJTQWn3IE5A6c8 AojAJHXshASx/Rkrn3+PReDavG+UV9A7JDqN+QPZME16UT47xb0rLy7iBE0OWnJRuK pGxY6wEdkjhCbwvnqAYm7fbnv+BA/u6N/OY8WdKSrPBNhsIOd9s6jqZWAbkP01eYb9 KZdAGZGBj9lJFSBwNAI3jXIlclY0pHQxLTegfMf5UQfmvMwsKodIbUfa1WPjLzPIkF 9y/nULVMh70++uL8nTM9v8BaQgBTHglgs88PJKEmrsZY0IE5sRJDHaJozA6wVc1car A0dAsWV/nhYrA== From: SeongJae Park To: Kevin Lourenco Cc: SeongJae Park , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix minor spelling mistakes in comments Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 19:56:25 -0800 Message-ID: <20251220035626.44647-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Stat-Signature: bxh3rd5j7yzy3zyrs5t83tqyax8xkcft X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B541520002 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1766202994-987048 X-HE-Meta: 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 JFGDEA/1 jnznF59qn4mhL7iHW3nSA93WK+nt7UF7sfHcOonCGFKRrTpq9PWUtWZ6SxwlD/n1mRl4Fe6BDUXXlylw0ierjiV8pDhY5RoHARajfMqgLGGPlbn+GW8KNxzACc4/5vIegVWOPJ7YLFqGJ47sB+5o8daZNtkX7Hz03H791nw/cObcv3tUOe2Dtr39L4jOFPSR0y38mBirgVG4QgiNyqjDiHCvke1PS3l5FdKcPOsGfXFZCUja1bVqGwV4X/GGlmLDM8ig/oTTsnFZ6pmc= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 04:49:27 +0100 Kevin Lourenco wrote: > Hi SJ, > > I think you’re right — the wording there is probably not correct. If > anything, I would be more inclined to use “the next step is” > (singular), since there is only one alignment step following the start > gap adjustment. > > That said, I intentionally limited this patch to clear typos. While > going through mm/, I did notice a number of grammatical issues in > comments, but I chose to ignore them to keep the scope focused cause > some typos actually made me wonder whether they were kernel-specific > terminology or just misspellings (e.g. “sinze boot”). > > So I’d prefer to keep this patch dedicated to obvious typos only, and > leave grammar cleanups for future patches. That makes sense to me :) > > Thanks a lot for the review! My pleasure! Thanks, SJ [...]