linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: khugepaged: remove mm when all memory has been collapsed
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 03:48:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251218034801.jyuu437dbtvcnpzw@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77paexkefc7qkfjgv6reuf7jxlysgkinuswsck5tthqkpcjkpr@aelvplwvafnt>

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:27:24AM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 03:31:55AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 05:04:17PM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote:
>> >The following data is traced by bpftrace on a desktop system. After
>> >the system has been left idle for 10 minutes upon booting, a lot of
>> >SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or SCAN_PMD_NONE are observed during a full scan by
>> >khugepaged.
>> >
>> >@scan_pmd_status[1]: 1           ## SCAN_SUCCEED
>> >@scan_pmd_status[4]: 158         ## SCAN_PMD_MAPPED
>> >@scan_pmd_status[3]: 174         ## SCAN_PMD_NONE
>> >total progress size: 701 MB
>> >Total time         : 440 seconds ## include khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs
>> >
>> >The khugepaged_scan list save all task that support collapse into hugepage,
>> >as long as the take is not destroyed, khugepaged will not remove it from
>> >the khugepaged_scan list. This exist a phenomenon where task has already
>> >collapsed all memory regions into hugepage, but khugepaged continues to
>> >scan it, which wastes CPU time and invalid, and due to
>> >khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs (default 10s) causes a long wait for
>> >scanning a large number of invalid task, so scanning really valid task
>> >is later.
>> >
>> >After applying this patch, when all memory is either SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or
>> >SCAN_PMD_NONE, the mm is automatically removed from khugepaged's scan
>> >list. If the page fault or MADV_HUGEPAGE again, it is added back to
>> >khugepaged.
>>
>> Two thing s come up my mind:
>>
>>   * what happens if we split the huge page under memory pressure?
>
>static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
>		struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
>		struct reclaim_stat *stat, bool ignore_references,
>		struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>{
>	...
>
>	folio = lru_to_folio(folio_list);
>
>	...
>
>	references = folio_check_references(folio, sc);
>	switch (references) {
>	case FOLIOREF_ACTIVATE:
>		goto activate_locked;
>	case FOLIOREF_KEEP:
>		stat->nr_ref_keep += nr_pages;
>		goto keep_locked;
>	case FOLIOREF_RECLAIM:
>	case FOLIOREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN:
>		; /* try to reclaim the folio below */
>	}
>
>	...
>
>	split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list);
>}
>
>During memory reclaim above, only inactive folios are split. This also
>implies that the folio is cold, meaning it hasn't been used recently, so
>we do not expect to put the mm back onto the khugepaged scan list to
>continue scan/collapse. khugeapged needs to scan hot folios as much as
>possible priorityly and collapse hot folios to avoid wasting CPU.
>

So we will never pout this process back onto the scan list, right?

>>   * would this interfere with mTHP collapse?
>
>It has no impact on mTHP collapse, only when all memory is either
>SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or SCAN_PMD_NONE, the mm will be removed automatically.
>other cases will not be removed.
>
>Let me know if I missed something please, thanks!
>
>>
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
>> >---
>> > mm/khugepaged.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> >index 0598a19a98cc..1ec1af5be3c8 100644
>> >--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> >+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> >@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct khugepaged_scan {
>> > 	struct list_head mm_head;
>> > 	struct mm_slot *mm_slot;
>> > 	unsigned long address;
>> >+	bool maybe_collapse;
>> > };
>> >
>> > static struct khugepaged_scan khugepaged_scan = {
>> >@@ -1420,22 +1421,19 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> > 	return result;
>> > }
>> >
>> >-static void collect_mm_slot(struct mm_slot *slot)
>> >+static void collect_mm_slot(struct mm_slot *slot, bool maybe_collapse)
>> > {
>> > 	struct mm_struct *mm = slot->mm;
>> >
>> > 	lockdep_assert_held(&khugepaged_mm_lock);
>> >
>> >-	if (hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm)) {
>> >+	if (hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm) || !maybe_collapse) {
>> > 		/* free mm_slot */
>> > 		hash_del(&slot->hash);
>> > 		list_del(&slot->mm_node);
>> >
>> >-		/*
>> >-		 * Not strictly needed because the mm exited already.
>> >-		 *
>> >-		 * mm_flags_clear(MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE, mm);
>> >-		 */
>> >+		if (!maybe_collapse)
>> >+			mm_flags_clear(MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE, mm);
>> >
>> > 		/* khugepaged_mm_lock actually not necessary for the below */
>> > 		mm_slot_free(mm_slot_cache, slot);
>> >@@ -2397,6 +2395,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
>> > 				     struct mm_slot, mm_node);
>> > 		khugepaged_scan.address = 0;
>> > 		khugepaged_scan.mm_slot = slot;
>> >+		khugepaged_scan.maybe_collapse = false;
>> > 	}
>> > 	spin_unlock(&khugepaged_mm_lock);
>> >
>> >@@ -2470,8 +2469,18 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
>> > 					khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked, cc);
>> > 			}
>> >
>> >-			if (*result == SCAN_SUCCEED)
>> >+			switch (*result) {
>> >+			case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
>> >+			case SCAN_PMD_NONE:
>> >+			case SCAN_PMD_MAPPED:
>> >+			case SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE:
>> >+				break;
>> >+			case SCAN_SUCCEED:
>> > 				++khugepaged_pages_collapsed;
>> >+				fallthrough;
>>
>> If collapse successfully, we don't need to set maybe_collapse to true?
>
>Above "fallthrough" explicitly tells the compiler that when the collapse is
>successful, run below "khugepaged_scan.maybe_collapse = true" :)
>

Got it, thanks.

>> >+			default:
>> >+				khugepaged_scan.maybe_collapse = true;
>> >+			}
>> >
>> > 			/* move to next address */
>> > 			khugepaged_scan.address += HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
>> >@@ -2500,6 +2509,11 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
>> > 	 * if we scanned all vmas of this mm.
>> > 	 */
>> > 	if (hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm) || !vma) {
>> >+		bool maybe_collapse = khugepaged_scan.maybe_collapse;
>> >+
>> >+		if (mm_flags_test(MMF_DISABLE_THP_COMPLETELY, mm))
>> >+			maybe_collapse = true;
>> >+
>> > 		/*
>> > 		 * Make sure that if mm_users is reaching zero while
>> > 		 * khugepaged runs here, khugepaged_exit will find
>> >@@ -2508,12 +2522,13 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
>> > 		if (!list_is_last(&slot->mm_node, &khugepaged_scan.mm_head)) {
>> > 			khugepaged_scan.mm_slot = list_next_entry(slot, mm_node);
>> > 			khugepaged_scan.address = 0;
>> >+			khugepaged_scan.maybe_collapse = false;
>> > 		} else {
>> > 			khugepaged_scan.mm_slot = NULL;
>> > 			khugepaged_full_scans++;
>> > 		}
>> >
>> >-		collect_mm_slot(slot);
>> >+		collect_mm_slot(slot, maybe_collapse);
>> > 	}
>> >
>> > 	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan(mm, progress, khugepaged_scan.mm_slot == NULL);
>> >@@ -2616,7 +2631,7 @@ static int khugepaged(void *none)
>> > 	slot = khugepaged_scan.mm_slot;
>> > 	khugepaged_scan.mm_slot = NULL;
>> > 	if (slot)
>> >-		collect_mm_slot(slot);
>> >+		collect_mm_slot(slot, true);
>> > 	spin_unlock(&khugepaged_mm_lock);
>> > 	return 0;
>> > }
>> >--
>> >2.51.0
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me
>
>--
>Thanks,
>Vernon

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-15  9:04 [PATCH 0/4] Improve khugepaged scan logic Vernon Yang
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: khugepaged: add trace_mm_khugepaged_scan event Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  9:24   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:21     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: khugepaged: remove mm when all memory has been collapsed Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 11:52   ` Lance Yang
2025-12-16  6:27     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 21:45   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16  6:30     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 23:01   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16  6:32     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-17  3:31   ` Wei Yang
2025-12-18  3:27     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  3:48       ` Wei Yang [this message]
2025-12-18  4:41         ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  9:29   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:24     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-19  9:00       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  8:35     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-19  8:55       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-23 11:18       ` Dev Jain
2025-12-25 16:07         ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-29  6:02         ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-22 19:00   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: khugepaged: move mm to list tail when MADV_COLD/MADV_FREE Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 21:12   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16  7:00     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-16 13:08   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16 13:31   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-18  9:31   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:29     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-19  8:58       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21  2:10         ` Wei Yang
2025-12-21  4:25           ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-21  9:24             ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21 12:34               ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-23  9:59                 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-25 15:12                   ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-21 12:38             ` Wei Yang
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: khugepaged: set to next mm direct when mm has MMF_DISABLE_THP_COMPLETELY Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  9:33   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:31     ` Vernon Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251218034801.jyuu437dbtvcnpzw@master \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
    --cc=yanglincheng@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox