From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 031F9D43369 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 03:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 62FA96B0005; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:46:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5E0406B0006; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:46:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4CF216B0007; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:46:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C466B0005 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:46:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0065C1A0403 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 03:46:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84209431278.06.50826D4 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF8B40006 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 03:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="C4QZX/JD"; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1765511177; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=yCl7lxaeUL7yy0JNSl41xrCAb4aCZBcyKphqll9vbX0=; b=m8YYWiK6iOfaERai8Ro+AZgeQzaSPw3G9Qz3o0dHQnTGkfqfdFwcsX0QsARFg2+0PspMFT o3ayA9V0wY3HMQ0Gt4dKZeYuXGLT8kqjE4bKV63hKSLnGAZXrjAlJ4ft9eqKE/dXwmxH2N Gzw7eI9Crgy02XByRI/C4//1thEbOPg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="C4QZX/JD"; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1765511177; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=0CfHAD6l1+7OJ7gJXky9ihQ8Z5drM058JTa4L3qA5hF1zpYY/nDTO2P5jOWubsQV5XTg0i ImgvIiTR7/5D6OFEom8tof+OlMe9D8D//uFVtRoDJ89kWsPODj1NBKsVdVjAg9j5fNK6+R mHT321RApM8lCkf/S6UAnC67n27wU/I= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3A660122; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 03:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F894C4CEF1; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 03:46:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765511176; bh=qWErqwHAXMoJbr0ah1yv8tAp2YJDlDct0fUARVDvVi8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C4QZX/JD1nZN7473nf5CYMKQ0CFajZXk8vZziiCmrLgU2wuvXn55tATlM/mJvmK1w 6CIFM0Yh/83i+ThQSdmg5FIsxBkfKvkHApjPaIRqZlOFDdKIt5xUvOWK1rLfW/5zty eFtABNX2glTPZuwG7CVCEliHWQT7Zx+SMaPhWw7i3vq/qx8tVSzVaemxW0WSqc8xXQ I30rOT8i4WFzx1/vZHX+cWQpXjrpqbK3C7nQoY/xfDzKbNOAajcnvEV36Bam4cbNIh qSPA4pCkOjZUzEiLkyzGl0BHBizALqxRMCG0FVSv9MykJZpRUQZmvQZC78aZ4PNCmZ cagh4AXKUb6nQ== From: SeongJae Park To: JaeJoon Jung Cc: SeongJae Park , damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: modified damon_call_control from static to kmalloc Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 19:46:12 -0800 Message-ID: <20251212034613.41033-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6BF8B40006 X-Stat-Signature: xe9rwbdqcrf4exya8dz5ctkeaqt6fben X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1765511177-880686 X-HE-Meta: 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 iCl4Y+AD aZ6wur5qxDzXbGkiV4jC+nyOAw/xy0KMRBeuB+oq/OXtcHPq/4ciQuyj87OsHaSStFXxrcrHGPvkyQu4K+DC3hdTONV26jgUiYMUwWyn7ti8kz0wC4fknNaN8sv8hbKOtoKoHXv8Sx/aZZL7e0EraS8p+b7b+01H1AhVmloaY6tIyP9znOIOB8MllQWgdcVuAOXMpc7+2dDNH4N+Ch7VFxRs5GYerySwnO0AWOkgwdH/a9FLY4FYA7E6JqYGyE/3Liiib8QyRTHXLsXOQeXPhHORwa/vDYT/4YeqrP7lrQk8GYU4= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:13:09 +0900 JaeJoon Jung wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 at 16:54, SeongJae Park wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 16:38:46 +0900 JaeJoon Jung wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 at 15:04, SeongJae Park wrote: > > [...] > > > > Sounds good. Would you mind sending a patch for that? > > > > > > Would you like me to send you the patch with only the comments corrected? > > > > I was just asking your preferrence, and seems you have no strong one. I will > > do that on my own unless you mind. > > I have been argued the following so far: > "I proposed unifying them into kmalloc()/kfree() methods and > removing the dealloc_on_cancel." Based on your previous email [1], I understand you argue this patch is better to be merged as-is, though you agree it has the pros and the cons. And therefore you are letting me to make the final decision. I was implicitly saying I show the cons more than the pros, so don't want to merge this as is. Sorry if it was too implicit. Hope now my opinion is clearly reached out to you. I also suggested making the comment better, and you agreed it but I understand you are not interested in making that change. I will do it. So, all is well and no more action from your side is required. > I apologize for not being able to respond promptly and smoothly > this week due to a busy my external lecture schedule. No worry, take your time. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/CAHOvCC6bJLf=LuBpm90n5poz8Sqhz9wjXtk5ypbPwkvhb1ptag@mail.gmail.com Thanks, SJ [...]