Re: [linus:master] [mm/vmalloc] a061578043: BUG:spinlock_trylock_failure_on_UP_on_CPU

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:30:51 -0800 "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512101320.e2f2dd6f-lkp@intel.com
> > 
> 
> Hmmm. This looks like a race condition tied to reclaim. I'm assuming
> we fail to allocate a page and kick off kswapd. Then when we fall back
> to the bulk allocator which tries to remove a pcp page at the same time as
> kswapd tries to reclaim it. Maybe?
> 
> Does something like this fix it?

Concerned.  If pcp page removal is racing with kswapd reclaim then
that's a problem.  Altering a caller so it doesn't tickle this bug
doesn't fix the bug?

> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index ecbac900c35f..0d1480723ddc 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3634,7 +3634,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
>  	struct page *page;
>  	int i;
>  	unsigned int large_order = ilog2(nr_remaining);
> -	gfp_t large_gfp = vmalloc_gfp_adjust(gfp, large_order) & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> +	gfp_t large_gfp = vmalloc_gfp_adjust(gfp, large_order) & ~__GFP_RECLAIM;
>  
>  	large_order = min(max_attempt_order, large_order);