linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	nao.horiguchi@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC Patch  11/11] mm/huge_memory: simplify split_huge_page() by calling __folio_split() directly
Date: Mon,  8 Dec 2025 14:36:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208143616.20797-12-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208143616.20797-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>

The current function call chain for splitting huge pages is overly
verbose:

split_huge_page() -> split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() ->
__split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() -> __folio_split()

Since __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() is merely a wrapper for
__folio_split(), and it is only used by
split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() (which is, in turn, only used by
split_huge_page()), the intermediate functions are redundant.

This commit refactors split_huge_page() to call __folio_split()
directly. This removes the unnecessary middle layers
(split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() and
__split_huge_page_to_list_to_order()), simplifying the splitting
interface.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
 include/linux/huge_mm.h | 20 +-------------------
 mm/huge_memory.c        |  5 ++---
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 95a68c19e177..a977e032385c 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -369,8 +369,6 @@ enum split_type {
 	SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM,
 };
 
-int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
-		unsigned int new_order);
 int folio_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order);
 unsigned int min_order_for_split(struct folio *folio);
 int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
@@ -380,12 +378,6 @@ int folio_split_uniform(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, struct list
 int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, struct page *page,
 		struct list_head *list);
 
-static inline int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
-		unsigned int new_order)
-{
-	return __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, list, new_order);
-}
-
 static inline int split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int new_order)
 {
 	return folio_split_uniform(folio, new_order, NULL);
@@ -412,10 +404,7 @@ static inline int try_folio_split_to_order(struct folio *folio,
 		return split_folio_to_order(folio, new_order);
 	return folio_split(folio, new_order, page, NULL);
 }
-static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
-{
-	return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, 0);
-}
+int split_huge_page(struct page *page);
 void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 void reparent_deferred_split_queue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
@@ -614,13 +603,6 @@ can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins)
 {
 	return false;
 }
-static inline int
-split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
-		unsigned int new_order)
-{
-	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(1, page);
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
 static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(1, page);
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index cedecfc1a40c..ded17d0fa695 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -4190,12 +4190,11 @@ int folio_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
-				     unsigned int new_order)
+int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 
-	return __folio_split(folio, new_order, &folio->page, page, list,
+	return __folio_split(folio, 0, &folio->page, page, NULL,
 			     SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM);
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-08 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-08 14:36 [RFC Patch 00/11] Convert huge page split API to folio-style Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 01/11] mm/huge_memory: relocate fundamental folio split comment to __folio_split() Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 02/11] mm/huge_memory: remove split_folio_to_list_to_order() helper Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 03/11] mm/huge_memory: convert try_folio_split_to_order() to use split_folio_to_order() Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 04/11] mm/memory-failure: convert try_to_split_thp_page() " Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 05/11] mm/huge_memory: remove unused function split_huge_page_to_order() Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 06/11] mm/huge_memory: introduce __split_folio_and_update_stats() to consolidate split task Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 07/11] mm/huge_memory: separate uniform/non uniform split logic in __split_unmapped_folio() Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 08/11] mm/huge_memory: restrict @split_at check to non-uniform splits Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 09/11] mm/huge_memory: introduce folio_split_uniform() helper for uniform splitting Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` [RFC Patch 10/11] mm/huge_memory: convert folio split helpers to use folio_split_uniform() Wei Yang
2025-12-08 14:36 ` Wei Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251208143616.20797-12-richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox