From: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, chuhu@redhat.com,
Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] selftests/mm: remove arm64 nr_hugepages setup for va_high_addr_switch test
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 20:22:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251207122239.3228920-3-chuhu@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251207122239.3228920-2-chuhu@redhat.com>
arm64 and x86_64 has the same nr_hugepages requriement for running the
va_high_addr_switch test. Since commit d9d957bd7b61 ("selftests/mm: alloc
hugepages in va_high_addr_switch test"), the setup can be done in
va_high_addr_switch.sh. So remove the duplicated setup.
CC: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
index d9173f2312b7..2dadbfc6e535 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
@@ -412,15 +412,7 @@ if [ $VADDR64 -ne 0 ]; then
fi
# va high address boundary switch test
- ARCH_ARM64="arm64"
- prev_nr_hugepages=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages)
- if [ "$ARCH" == "$ARCH_ARM64" ]; then
- echo 6 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
- fi
CATEGORY="hugevm" run_test bash ./va_high_addr_switch.sh
- if [ "$ARCH" == "$ARCH_ARM64" ]; then
- echo $prev_nr_hugepages > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
- fi
fi # VADDR64
# vmalloc stability smoke test
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-07 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-07 12:22 [PATCH v1 1/3] selftests/mm: fix va_high_addr_switch.sh return value Chunyu Hu
2025-12-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/mm: allocate 6 hugepages in va_high_addr_switch.sh Chunyu Hu
2025-12-07 12:22 ` Chunyu Hu [this message]
2025-12-08 15:48 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] selftests/mm: remove arm64 nr_hugepages setup for va_high_addr_switch test Luiz Capitulino
2025-12-08 15:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/mm: allocate 6 hugepages in va_high_addr_switch.sh Luiz Capitulino
2025-12-08 15:44 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] selftests/mm: fix va_high_addr_switch.sh return value Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251207122239.3228920-3-chuhu@redhat.com \
--to=chuhu@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox