From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 9966/13055] kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask'
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:44:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251203144453.be34d189c5e6668ce2da06b3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com>
On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:05:30 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 47b7b5e32bb7264b51b89186043e1ada4090b558
> commit: a9af76a78760717361cccc884dc649e30db61c8b [9966/13055] watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup
> config: powerpc64-randconfig-002-20251203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 734a912d0f025559fcf76bde9aaaeb0383c1625a)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251203/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable]
> 74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 warning generated.
I'm testing the appended patch but it needs checking please.
The comment for hardlockup_si_mask says
* bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when
* hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc.
* Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition.
but the variable depends on "COUNTS_HRTIMER". The comment doesn't
mention hrtimers and I don't see why it should. Not sure what's going
on here.
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: kernel/watchdog.c: fix unused var warning
Date: Wed Dec 3 02:34:40 PM PST 2025
>> kernel/watchdog.c:74:22: warning: unused variable 'hardlockup_si_mask' [-Wunused-variable]
74 | static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
Fixes: a9af76a78760 ("watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202512030920.NFKtekA7-lkp@intel.com
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c~kernel-watchdogc-fix-unused-var-warning
+++ a/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -66,13 +66,6 @@ int __read_mostly sysctl_hardlockup_all_
unsigned int __read_mostly hardlockup_panic =
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC);
-/*
- * bitmasks to control what kinds of system info to be printed when
- * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc.
- * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition.
- */
-static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
static unsigned int hardlockup_count;
@@ -135,6 +128,13 @@ __setup("nmi_watchdog=", hardlockup_pani
#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER)
+/*
+ * bitmask to control what kinds of system info to be printed when
+ * hard lockup is detected, it could be task, memory, lock etc.
+ * Refer include/linux/sys_info.h for detailed bit definition.
+ */
+static unsigned long hardlockup_si_mask;
+
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, hrtimer_interrupts);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hrtimer_interrupts_saved);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, watchdog_hardlockup_warned);
@@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
.extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
},
+#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_COUNTS_HRTIMER)
{
.procname = "hardlockup_sys_info",
.data = &hardlockup_si_mask,
@@ -1257,6 +1258,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table watchdog_s
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = sysctl_sys_info_handler,
},
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
{
.procname = "hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace",
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-03 1:05 kernel test robot
2025-12-03 14:58 ` Feng Tang
2025-12-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-12-04 13:38 ` Petr Mladek
2025-12-04 14:12 ` Feng Tang
2025-12-04 13:57 ` Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251203144453.be34d189c5e6668ce2da06b3@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox