From: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
To: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<bigeasy@linutronix.de>, <brauner@kernel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <hch@lst.de>, <jack@suse.com>,
<liaohua4@huawei.com>, <lilinjie8@huawei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<pangliyuan1@huawei.com>, <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<wozizhi@huaweicloud.com>, <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>,
<yangerkun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:05:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251129100557.10610-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251129094448.GL3538@ZenIV>
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 09:44:48 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 05:25:45PM +0800, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
>> In fact, I have already submitted another patch, which is exactly the way
>> as you described:
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251127140109.191657-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
>>
>> The only difference is that I will move the judgment to before
>> local_irq_enable(). The reason for doing this is to fix another bug,
>> you can find more details about it here:
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250925025744.6807-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251129021815.9679-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
>
>AFAICS, your patch does nothing to the case when we hit kernel address from
>kernel mode, which is what triggers that "block in RCU mode for no good reason"
>fun...
I'm a little confused. Which patch are you referring to?
BTW, I'm trying my best to fix both of these two bugs (might_sleep() in
RCU Read Critical Section and missing harden_branch_predictor()
mitigation):
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251126090505.3057219-1-wozizhi@huaweicloud.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250925025744.6807-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
at the same time, because I feel that the solutions of these two bugs are
very similar in some way. And there is a preliminary solution in place:
```patch
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
index 2bc828a1940c..5c58072d8235 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
@@ -270,10 +270,15 @@ do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (kprobe_page_fault(regs, fsr))
return 0;
+ if (unlikely(addr >= TASK_SIZE)) {
+ fault = 0;
+ code = SEGV_MAPERR;
+ goto bad_area;
+ }
/* Enable interrupts if they were enabled in the parent context. */
if (interrupts_enabled(regs))
local_irq_enable();
```
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251127140109.191657-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
I'm not sure if I'm doing the right thing. Do you have any suggestions for
this?
Thanks very much!
Xie Yuanbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-29 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 9:05 [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Zizhi Wo
2025-11-26 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH] vfs: Fix might sleep in load_unaligned_zeropad() with rcu read lock held Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-26 18:10 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 18:48 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 19:05 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-26 19:26 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 19:51 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-26 20:02 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 22:25 ` david laight
2025-11-26 23:51 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 23:31 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-27 3:03 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-27 7:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-27 11:20 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-28 1:39 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-26 20:42 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 10:27 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Zizhi Wo
2025-11-26 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-27 10:27 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-27 10:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-28 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-29 1:01 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-29 4:08 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-29 9:08 ` Al Viro
2025-11-29 9:25 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-29 9:44 ` Al Viro
2025-11-29 10:05 ` Xie Yuanbin [this message]
2025-11-29 10:45 ` david laight
2025-11-29 8:54 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Al Viro
2025-12-01 2:08 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 2:18 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-01 13:28 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Will Deacon
2025-12-02 12:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-12-02 13:02 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-02 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-12-03 1:48 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-05 12:08 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-26 18:55 ` Al Viro
2025-11-27 2:24 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 3:37 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 3:01 ` [RFC][alpha] saner vmalloc handling (was Re: [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context) Al Viro
2025-11-30 11:32 ` david laight
2025-11-30 16:43 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 18:14 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-11-30 19:03 ` david laight
2025-11-30 20:31 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 20:32 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-30 23:37 ` Al Viro
2025-12-01 2:03 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Zizhi Wo
2025-11-27 12:59 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-28 1:17 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-28 1:18 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-28 1:39 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-28 12:25 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-29 1:02 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 3:55 ` Al Viro
2025-12-01 2:38 ` Zizhi Wo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251129100557.10610-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com \
--to=xieyuanbin1@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=liaohua4@huawei.com \
--cc=lilinjie8@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=pangliyuan1@huawei.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wozizhi@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox