From: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
To: <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
<linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
<bigeasy@linutronix.de>, <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <brauner@kernel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <hch@lst.de>, <jack@suse.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <pangliyuan1@huawei.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <wozizhi@huaweicloud.com>,
<xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<lilinjie8@huawei.com>, <liaohua4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:18:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251129021815.9679-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wh+cFLLi2x6u61pvL07phSyHPVBTo9Lac2uuqK4eRG_=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Linus Torvalds and Will Deacon!
We have some discussion and solutions on other threads, and it seems
that there are somthing missing on this discussion thread. Therefore,
I think it is necessary to synchronize some information here.
1. There is a test case that can consistently reproduce the bug, which
might be helpful for us to do the test. The test case is located after
the '---' maker line in the following patch:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251126101952.174467-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
2. Al Viro give a suggest on 2025-11-26 19:26:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251126192640.GD3538@ZenIV
This patch is similar to one I submitted long time ago, which was
intended fix another bug: missing branch predictor mitigation:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250925025744.6807-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
My patch was not accepted, Sebastian's patch:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251110145555.2555055-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de
fixed this bug, but Sebastian's patch has not yet been merged into the
linux-next branch, so this bug still exists in the current linux-next
branch.
I hope there is a simple solution to fix both bugs, so I submitted this
patch on 2025-11-27 14:49:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20251127140109.191657-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
This patch is based on the linux-next branch, therefore it does not
contain Sebastian's patch.
3. On 2025-11-28 17:06, Linus Torvalds provided a solution similar to
Al Viro's suggestion and my patch:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/CAHk-=wh+cFLLi2x6u61pvL07phSyHPVBTo9Lac2uuqK4eRG_=w@mail.gmail.com
Currently, all solutions have been tested that can fix this one bug.
I still hold the view that perhaps there is a simpler way to fix another
bug at the same time, because the solutions of these two bugs are very
similar.
Thanks very much!
Xie Yuanbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-29 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 9:05 [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Zizhi Wo
2025-11-26 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH] vfs: Fix might sleep in load_unaligned_zeropad() with rcu read lock held Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-26 18:10 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 18:48 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 19:05 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-26 19:26 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 19:51 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-26 20:02 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 22:25 ` david laight
2025-11-26 23:51 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 23:31 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-27 3:03 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-27 7:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-27 11:20 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-28 1:39 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-26 20:42 ` Al Viro
2025-11-26 10:27 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Zizhi Wo
2025-11-26 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-27 10:27 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-27 10:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-28 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-29 1:01 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-29 4:08 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-29 9:08 ` Al Viro
2025-11-29 9:25 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-29 9:44 ` Al Viro
2025-11-29 10:05 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-11-29 10:45 ` david laight
2025-11-29 8:54 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Al Viro
2025-12-01 2:08 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 2:18 ` Xie Yuanbin [this message]
2025-12-01 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2025-12-02 12:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-12-02 13:02 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-02 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-12-03 1:48 ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-05 12:08 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-11-26 18:55 ` Al Viro
2025-11-27 2:24 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 3:37 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 3:01 ` [RFC][alpha] saner vmalloc handling (was Re: [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context) Al Viro
2025-11-30 11:32 ` david laight
2025-11-30 16:43 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 18:14 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-11-30 19:03 ` david laight
2025-11-30 20:31 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 20:32 ` Al Viro
2025-11-30 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-30 23:37 ` Al Viro
2025-12-01 2:03 ` [Bug report] hash_name() may cross page boundary and trigger sleep in RCU context Zizhi Wo
2025-11-27 12:59 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-28 1:17 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-28 1:18 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-28 1:39 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-28 12:25 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-29 1:02 ` Zizhi Wo
2025-11-29 3:55 ` Al Viro
2025-12-01 2:38 ` Zizhi Wo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251129021815.9679-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com \
--to=xieyuanbin1@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=liaohua4@huawei.com \
--cc=lilinjie8@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=pangliyuan1@huawei.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wozizhi@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox