From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lujialin4@huawei.com,
chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH -next] memcg: Remove inc/dec_lruvec_kmem_state helpers
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 02:04:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251126020435.1511637-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
The dec_lruvec_kmem_state helper is unused by any caller and can be safely
removed. Meanwhile, the inc_lruvec_kmem_state helper is only referenced by
shadow_lru_isolate, retaining these two helpers is unnecessary. This patch
removes both helper functions to eliminate redundant code.
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 ----------
mm/workingset.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index d35390f9892a..0651865a4564 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1452,16 +1452,6 @@ struct slabobj_ext {
#endif
} __aligned(8);
-static inline void inc_lruvec_kmem_state(void *p, enum node_stat_item idx)
-{
- mod_lruvec_kmem_state(p, idx, 1);
-}
-
-static inline void dec_lruvec_kmem_state(void *p, enum node_stat_item idx)
-{
- mod_lruvec_kmem_state(p, idx, -1);
-}
-
static inline struct lruvec *parent_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index 892f6fe94ea9..e9f05634747a 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ static enum lru_status shadow_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(node->count != node->nr_values))
goto out_invalid;
xa_delete_node(node, workingset_update_node);
- inc_lruvec_kmem_state(node, WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM);
+ mod_lruvec_kmem_state(node, WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM, 1);
out_invalid:
xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 2:04 Chen Ridong [this message]
2025-11-26 2:49 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-26 16:34 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251126020435.1511637-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox