linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/mm_init: Introduce a boot parameter for check_pages
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:44:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251125184416.1493908-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aSWDkuJEdk9cdVCK@kernel.org>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:23:14 +0200 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 02:54:06PM -0800, Joshua Hahn wrote:
> > Use-after-free and double-free bugs can be very difficult to track down.
> > The kernel is good at tracking these and preventing bad pages from being
> > used/created through simple checks gated behind "check_pages_enabled".
> > 
> > Currently, the only ways to enable this flag is by building with
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, or as a side effect of other checks such as
> > init_on_{alloc, free}, page_poisoning, or debug_pagealloc among others.
> > These solutions are powerful, but may often be too coarse in balancing
> > the performance vs. safety that a user may want, particularly in
> > latency-sensitive production environments.
> > 
> > Introduce a new boot parameter "check_pages", which enables page checking
> > with no other side effects. It takes kstrbool-able inputs as an argument
> > (i.e. 0/1, true/false, on/off, ...). This patch is backwards-compatible;
> > setting CONFIG_DEBUG_VM still enables page checking.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>

...

Hello Mike, thank you for your review!

> > +static bool _check_pages_enabled_early __initdata;
> 
> No need in the leading underscore.

Gotcha, no preference here on my end at all, so I'm happy to drop the leading
underscore. I was just modeling the variable after _init_on_alloc_enabled_early
and _init_on_free_enabled_early, but it seems like those are the only ones
that do have this leading underscore anyways.

> > +
> > +static int __init early_check_pages(char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	return kstrtobool(buf, &_check_pages_enabled_early);
> > +}
> > +early_param("check_pages", early_check_pages);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Enable static keys related to various memory debugging and hardening options.
> >   * Some override others, and depend on early params that are evaluated in the
> > @@ -2591,7 +2599,8 @@ static void __init mem_debugging_and_hardening_init(void)
> >  	 * of struct pages being allocated or freed. With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM it's
> >  	 * enabled already.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) && want_check_pages)
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) && (_check_pages_enabled_early ||
> > +					     want_check_pages))
> 
> You can initialize want_check_pages to check_pages_enabled_early, would be
> clearer IMO.

Yup, totally makes sense as well. I'll include this change in v3.
Thank you for all your feedback, I hope you have a great day!

Joshua


      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-25 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-24 22:54 Joshua Hahn
2025-11-24 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/mm_init: decouple page checking and init_on_{alloc, free} Joshua Hahn
2025-11-25  1:18   ` SeongJae Park
2025-11-25 18:59     ` Joshua Hahn
2025-11-25  8:45   ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-25 18:06     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-25 18:58       ` Joshua Hahn
2025-11-25  1:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/mm_init: Introduce a boot parameter for check_pages SeongJae Park
2025-11-25  8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-25 10:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 18:44   ` Joshua Hahn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251125184416.1493908-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --to=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox