From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org,cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com,chrisl@kernel.org,corbet@lwn.net,ddstreet@ieee.org,greg@kroah.com,gthelen@google.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,ivan@cloudflare.com,lance.yang@linux.dev,leon.huangfu@shopee.com,linux-mm@kvack.org,lizefan.x@bytedance.com,longman@redhat.com,mhocko@kernel.org,mkoutny@suse.com,muchun.song@linux.dev,nphamcs@gmail.com,roman.gushchin@linux.dev,sashal@kernel.org,shakeelb@google.com,shy828301@gmail.com,sjenning@redhat.com,tj@kernel.org,vishal.moola@gmail.com,vitaly.wool@konsulko.com,weixugc@google.com,yosryahmed@google.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm: memcg: make stats flushing threshold per-memcg" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:08:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025112143-cattail-revivable-3c5d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103075135.20254-6-leon.huangfu@shopee.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm: memcg: make stats flushing threshold per-memcg
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-memcg-make-stats-flushing-threshold-per-memcg.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From leon.huangfu@shopee.com Mon Nov 3 08:53:30 2025
From: Leon Huang Fu <leon.huangfu@shopee.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:51:33 +0800
Subject: mm: memcg: make stats flushing threshold per-memcg
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, corbet@lwn.net, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeelb@google.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sjenning@redhat.com, ddstreet@ieee.org, vitaly.wool@konsulko.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, leon.huangfu@shopee.com, shy828301@gmail.com, yosryahmed@google.com, sashal@kernel.org, vishal.moola@gmail.com, cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>, Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20251103075135.20254-6-leon.huangfu@shopee.com>
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
[ Upstream commit 8d59d2214c2362e7a9d185d80b613e632581af7b ]
A global counter for the magnitude of memcg stats update is maintained on
the memcg side to avoid invoking rstat flushes when the pending updates
are not significant. This avoids unnecessary flushes, which are not very
cheap even if there isn't a lot of stats to flush. It also avoids
unnecessary lock contention on the underlying global rstat lock.
Make this threshold per-memcg. The scheme is followed where percpu (now
also per-memcg) counters are incremented in the update path, and only
propagated to per-memcg atomics when they exceed a certain threshold.
This provides two benefits: (a) On large machines with a lot of memcgs,
the global threshold can be reached relatively fast, so guarding the
underlying lock becomes less effective. Making the threshold per-memcg
avoids this.
(b) Having a global threshold makes it hard to do subtree flushes, as we
cannot reset the global counter except for a full flush. Per-memcg
counters removes this as a blocker from doing subtree flushes, which helps
avoid unnecessary work when the stats of a small subtree are needed.
Nothing is free, of course. This comes at a cost: (a) A new per-cpu
counter per memcg, consuming NR_CPUS * NR_MEMCGS * 4 bytes. The extra
memory usage is insigificant.
(b) More work on the update side, although in the common case it will only
be percpu counter updates. The amount of work scales with the number of
ancestors (i.e. tree depth). This is not a new concept, adding a cgroup
to the rstat tree involves a parent loop, so is charging. Testing results
below show no significant regressions.
(c) The error margin in the stats for the system as a whole increases from
NR_CPUS * MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to NR_CPUS * MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH * NR_MEMCGS.
This is probably fine because we have a similar per-memcg error in charges
coming from percpu stocks, and we have a periodic flusher that makes sure
we always flush all the stats every 2s anyway.
This patch was tested to make sure no significant regressions are
introduced on the update path as follows. The following benchmarks were
ran in a cgroup that is 2 levels deep (/sys/fs/cgroup/a/b/):
(1) Running 22 instances of netperf on a 44 cpu machine with
hyperthreading disabled. All instances are run in a level 2 cgroup, as
well as netserver:
# netserver -6
# netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K
Averaging 20 runs, the numbers are as follows:
Base: 40198.0 mbps
Patched: 38629.7 mbps (-3.9%)
The regression is minimal, especially for 22 instances in the same
cgroup sharing all ancestors (so updating the same atomics).
(2) will-it-scale page_fault tests. These tests (specifically
per_process_ops in page_fault3 test) detected a 25.9% regression before
for a change in the stats update path [1]. These are the
numbers from 10 runs (+ is good) on a machine with 256 cpus:
LABEL | MEAN | MEDIAN | STDDEV |
------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------------
page_fault1_per_process_ops | | | |
(A) base | 270249.164 | 265437.000 | 13451.836 |
(B) patched | 261368.709 | 255725.000 | 13394.767 |
| -3.29% | -3.66% | |
page_fault1_per_thread_ops | | | |
(A) base | 242111.345 | 239737.000 | 10026.031 |
(B) patched | 237057.109 | 235305.000 | 9769.687 |
| -2.09% | -1.85% | |
page_fault1_scalability | | |
(A) base | 0.034387 | 0.035168 | 0.0018283 |
(B) patched | 0.033988 | 0.034573 | 0.0018056 |
| -1.16% | -1.69% | |
page_fault2_per_process_ops | | |
(A) base | 203561.836 | 203301.000 | 2550.764 |
(B) patched | 197195.945 | 197746.000 | 2264.263 |
| -3.13% | -2.73% | |
page_fault2_per_thread_ops | | |
(A) base | 171046.473 | 170776.000 | 1509.679 |
(B) patched | 166626.327 | 166406.000 | 768.753 |
| -2.58% | -2.56% | |
page_fault2_scalability | | |
(A) base | 0.054026 | 0.053821 | 0.00062121 |
(B) patched | 0.053329 | 0.05306 | 0.00048394 |
| -1.29% | -1.41% | |
page_fault3_per_process_ops | | |
(A) base | 1295807.782 | 1297550.000 | 5907.585 |
(B) patched | 1275579.873 | 1273359.000 | 8759.160 |
| -1.56% | -1.86% | |
page_fault3_per_thread_ops | | |
(A) base | 391234.164 | 390860.000 | 1760.720 |
(B) patched | 377231.273 | 376369.000 | 1874.971 |
| -3.58% | -3.71% | |
page_fault3_scalability | | |
(A) base | 0.60369 | 0.60072 | 0.0083029 |
(B) patched | 0.61733 | 0.61544 | 0.009855 |
| +2.26% | +2.45% | |
All regressions seem to be minimal, and within the normal variance for the
benchmark. The fix for [1] assumes that 3% is noise -- and there were no
further practical complaints), so hopefully this means that such
variations in these microbenchmarks do not reflect on practical workloads.
(3) I also ran stress-ng in a nested cgroup and did not observe any
obvious regressions.
[1]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190520063534.GB19312@shao2-debian/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231129032154.3710765-4-yosryahmed@google.com
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Tested-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Huang Fu <leon.huangfu@shopee.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -628,6 +628,9 @@ struct memcg_vmstats_percpu {
/* Cgroup1: threshold notifications & softlimit tree updates */
unsigned long nr_page_events;
unsigned long targets[MEM_CGROUP_NTARGETS];
+
+ /* Stats updates since the last flush */
+ unsigned int stats_updates;
};
struct memcg_vmstats {
@@ -642,6 +645,9 @@ struct memcg_vmstats {
/* Pending child counts during tree propagation */
long state_pending[MEMCG_NR_STAT];
unsigned long events_pending[NR_MEMCG_EVENTS];
+
+ /* Stats updates since the last flush */
+ atomic64_t stats_updates;
};
/*
@@ -661,9 +667,7 @@ struct memcg_vmstats {
*/
static void flush_memcg_stats_dwork(struct work_struct *w);
static DECLARE_DEFERRABLE_WORK(stats_flush_dwork, flush_memcg_stats_dwork);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, stats_updates);
static atomic_t stats_flush_ongoing = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-static atomic_t stats_flush_threshold = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static u64 flush_last_time;
#define FLUSH_TIME (2UL*HZ)
@@ -690,26 +694,37 @@ static void memcg_stats_unlock(void)
preempt_enable_nested();
}
+
+static bool memcg_should_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ return atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates) >
+ MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH * num_online_cpus();
+}
+
static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
unsigned int x;
if (!val)
return;
- cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, smp_processor_id());
+ cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
+
+ for (; memcg; memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) {
+ x = __this_cpu_add_return(memcg->vmstats_percpu->stats_updates,
+ abs(val));
+
+ if (x < MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH)
+ continue;
- x = __this_cpu_add_return(stats_updates, abs(val));
- if (x > MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH) {
/*
- * If stats_flush_threshold exceeds the threshold
- * (>num_online_cpus()), cgroup stats update will be triggered
- * in __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(). Increasing this var further
- * is redundant and simply adds overhead in atomic update.
+ * If @memcg is already flush-able, increasing stats_updates is
+ * redundant. Avoid the overhead of the atomic update.
*/
- if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_threshold) <= num_online_cpus())
- atomic_add(x / MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH, &stats_flush_threshold);
- __this_cpu_write(stats_updates, 0);
+ if (!memcg_should_flush_stats(memcg))
+ atomic64_add(x, &memcg->vmstats->stats_updates);
+ __this_cpu_write(memcg->vmstats_percpu->stats_updates, 0);
}
}
@@ -728,13 +743,12 @@ static void do_flush_stats(void)
cgroup_rstat_flush(root_mem_cgroup->css.cgroup);
- atomic_set(&stats_flush_threshold, 0);
atomic_set(&stats_flush_ongoing, 0);
}
void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
{
- if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_threshold) > num_online_cpus())
+ if (memcg_should_flush_stats(root_mem_cgroup))
do_flush_stats();
}
@@ -748,8 +762,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(
static void flush_memcg_stats_dwork(struct work_struct *w)
{
/*
- * Always flush here so that flushing in latency-sensitive paths is
- * as cheap as possible.
+ * Deliberately ignore memcg_should_flush_stats() here so that flushing
+ * in latency-sensitive paths is as cheap as possible.
*/
do_flush_stats();
queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &stats_flush_dwork, FLUSH_TIME);
@@ -5658,6 +5672,10 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush(s
}
}
}
+ statc->stats_updates = 0;
+ /* We are in a per-cpu loop here, only do the atomic write once */
+ if (atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates))
+ atomic64_set(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates, 0);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from leon.huangfu@shopee.com are
queue-6.6/mm-memcg-make-stats-flushing-threshold-per-memcg.patch
queue-6.6/mm-memcg-change-flush_next_time-to-flush_last_time.patch
queue-6.6/mm-memcg-restore-subtree-stats-flushing.patch
queue-6.6/mm-workingset-move-the-stats-flush-into-workingset_test_recent.patch
queue-6.6/mm-memcg-add-thp-swap-out-info-for-anonymous-reclaim.patch
queue-6.6/mm-memcg-add-per-memcg-zswap-writeback-stat.patch
queue-6.6/mm-memcg-move-vmstats-structs-definition-above-flushing-code.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-21 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 7:51 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/7] mm: memcg: subtree stats flushing and thresholds Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-03 7:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/7] mm: memcg: add THP swap out info for anonymous reclaim Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-21 10:08 ` Patch "mm: memcg: add THP swap out info for anonymous reclaim" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-03 7:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/7] mm: memcg: add per-memcg zswap writeback stat Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-21 10:08 ` Patch "mm: memcg: add per-memcg zswap writeback stat" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-03 7:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 3/7] mm: memcg: change flush_next_time to flush_last_time Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-21 10:08 ` Patch "mm: memcg: change flush_next_time to flush_last_time" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-03 7:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 4/7] mm: memcg: move vmstats structs definition above flushing code Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-21 10:08 ` Patch "mm: memcg: move vmstats structs definition above flushing code" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-03 7:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 5/7] mm: memcg: make stats flushing threshold per-memcg Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-21 10:08 ` gregkh [this message]
2025-11-03 7:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 6/7] mm: workingset: move the stats flush into workingset_test_recent() Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-21 10:08 ` Patch "mm: workingset: move the stats flush into workingset_test_recent()" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-03 7:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 7/7] mm: memcg: restore subtree stats flushing Leon Huang Fu
2025-11-21 10:08 ` Patch "mm: memcg: restore subtree stats flushing" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025112143-cattail-revivable-3c5d@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ivan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=leon.huangfu@shopee.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=vitaly.wool@konsulko.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox