linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Wei Yang" <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	"Joshua Hahn" <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	"Rakie Kim" <rakie.kim@sk.com>,
	"Byungchul Park" <byungchul@sk.com>,
	"Gregory Price" <gourry@gourry.net>,
	"Ying Huang" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"Nico Pache" <npache@redhat.com>,
	"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	"Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>, "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
	"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	"Mika Penttilä" <mpenttil@redhat.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Francois Dugast" <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory.c: introduce folio_split_unmapped
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 08:02:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114080232.kxms4vjlkiiuxqpl@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <870151ce-ca90-4cd4-8f21-35f4da329924@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:30:03PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>On 11/14/25 14:21, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 12:22:28PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> [...]
>>> @@ -4079,6 +4091,36 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>> 	return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * This function is a helper for splitting folios that have already been unmapped.
>>> + * The use case is that the device or the CPU can refuse to migrate THP pages in
>>> + * the middle of migration, due to allocation issues on either side
>>> + *
>>> + * The high level code is copied from __folio_split, since the pages are anonymous
>>> + * and are already isolated from the LRU, the code has been simplified to not
>>> + * burden __folio_split with unmapped sprinkled into the code.
>>> + *
>>> + * None of the split folios are unlocked
>>> + */
>>> +int folio_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order)
>>> +{
>>> +	int extra_pins, ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_mapped(folio), folio);
>>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
>>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
>>> +
>> 
>> Compared with original logic, we did check folio_split_supported() and
>> check whether new_order is supported for the file system.
>> 
>> Currently folio_split_unmapped() only pass 0 as new_order, which looks good.
>> But for a generic helper, it looks reasonable to do the check, IMHO.
>> 
>
>This is meant to be used in the middle of a migration where the src/dst do 
>no agree on the folio_order() due to allocation issues. When mTHP support
>is added to device migration, order support will be added and checked.
>FYI: This routines supports just anonymous pages ATM
>

OK, I don't see these assumptions. Not sure it would be abused.

Maybe a comment would help? Or remove the new_order now? We can add it when it
is truly used.

>>> +	if (!can_split_folio(folio, 1, &extra_pins))
>>> +		return -EAGAIN;
>>> +
>>> +	local_irq_disable();
>>> +	ret = __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(folio, new_order, &folio->page, NULL,
>>> +						NULL, false, NULL, SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM,
>>> +						0, extra_pins);
>>> +	local_irq_enable();
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /*
>>>  * This function splits a large folio into smaller folios of order @new_order.
>>>  * @page can point to any page of the large folio to split. The split operation
>> 
>> 
>
>Balbir

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-14  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14  1:22 Balbir Singh
2025-11-14  2:11 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-14  3:21 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-14  3:25   ` Wei Yang
2025-11-14  3:30   ` Balbir Singh
2025-11-14  8:02     ` Wei Yang [this message]
2025-11-14  8:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-14  9:10   ` Balbir Singh
2025-11-18 20:18     ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-15  2:15 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-15  2:33   ` Balbir Singh
2025-11-15  2:36     ` Zi Yan
2025-11-19 12:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-11-19 23:58   ` Balbir Singh
2025-11-20  0:29     ` Zi Yan
2025-11-20  5:26     ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251114080232.kxms4vjlkiiuxqpl@master \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mpenttil@redhat.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox