From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, longman@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, osalvador@suse.de, ziy@nvidia.com,
matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, kees@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
rientjes@google.com, jackmanb@google.com, cl@gentwo.org,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, axelrasmussen@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, yosry.ahmed@linux.dev,
nphamcs@gmail.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com, rrichter@amd.com,
ming.li@zohomail.com, usamaarif642@gmail.com, brauner@kernel.org,
oleg@redhat.com, namcao@linutronix.de, escape@linux.alibaba.com,
dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] cpuset: introduce cpuset.mems.sysram
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:29:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112192936.2574429-8-gourry@gourry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112192936.2574429-1-gourry@gourry.net>
mems_sysram contains only SystemRAM nodes (omitting SPM Nodes). The
nodelist is effectively intersect(effective_mems, mt_sysram_nodelist).
When checking mems_allowed, check for GFP_SPM_NODE to determine if
the check should be made against mems_sysram or mems_allowed, since
mems_sysram only contains sysram nodes.
This omits "Specific Purpose Memory Nodes" from default mems_allowed
checks, making those nodes unreachable via "normal" allocation paths
(page faults, mempolicies, etc).
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 8 ++--
kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h | 8 ++++
kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c | 7 +++
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
mm/memcontrol.c | 3 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +--
mm/migrate.c | 4 +-
7 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index 9baaf19431b5..375bf446b66e 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ extern void cpuset_unlock(void);
extern void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *mask);
extern bool cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p);
extern bool cpuset_cpu_is_isolated(int cpu);
-extern nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
+extern nodemask_t cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
#define cpuset_current_sysram_nodes (current->sysram_nodes)
#define cpuset_current_mems_allowed (cpuset_current_sysram_nodes)
void cpuset_init_current_sysram_nodes(void);
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask)
task_unlock(current);
}
-extern bool cpuset_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid);
+extern bool cpuset_sysram_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid);
#else /* !CONFIG_CPUSETS */
static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void) { return false; }
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static inline bool cpuset_cpu_is_isolated(int cpu)
return false;
}
-static inline nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline nodemask_t cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(struct task_struct *p)
{
return node_possible_map;
}
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
return false;
}
-static inline bool cpuset_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
+static inline bool cpuset_sysram_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
{
return true;
}
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
index 337608f408ce..64e48fe040ed 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ typedef enum {
FILE_MEMORY_MIGRATE,
FILE_CPULIST,
FILE_MEMLIST,
+ FILE_MEMS_SYSRAM,
FILE_EFFECTIVE_CPULIST,
FILE_EFFECTIVE_MEMLIST,
FILE_SUBPARTS_CPULIST,
@@ -104,6 +105,13 @@ struct cpuset {
cpumask_var_t effective_cpus;
nodemask_t effective_mems;
+ /*
+ * SystemRAM Memory Nodes for tasks.
+ * This is the intersection of effective_mems and mt_sysram_nodelist.
+ * Tasks will have their sysram_nodes set to this value.
+ */
+ nodemask_t mems_sysram;
+
/*
* Exclusive CPUs dedicated to current cgroup (default hierarchy only)
*
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c
index 12e76774c75b..c58215d7230e 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c
@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ void cpuset1_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs,
cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, new_cpus);
cs->mems_allowed = *new_mems;
cs->effective_mems = *new_mems;
+ cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(cs);
cpuset_callback_unlock_irq();
/*
@@ -532,6 +533,12 @@ struct cftype cpuset1_files[] = {
.private = FILE_EFFECTIVE_MEMLIST,
},
+ {
+ .name = "mems_sysram",
+ .seq_show = cpuset_common_seq_show,
+ .private = FILE_MEMS_SYSRAM,
+ },
+
{
.name = "cpu_exclusive",
.read_u64 = cpuset_read_u64,
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index f0c59621a7f2..e08b59a0cf99 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
+#include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -428,11 +429,11 @@ static void guarantee_active_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
*
* Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
*/
-static void guarantee_online_mems(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
+static void guarantee_online_sysram_nodes(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
{
- while (!nodes_intersects(cs->effective_mems, node_states[N_MEMORY]))
+ while (!nodes_intersects(cs->mems_sysram, node_states[N_MEMORY]))
cs = parent_cs(cs);
- nodes_and(*pmask, cs->effective_mems, node_states[N_MEMORY]);
+ nodes_and(*pmask, cs->mems_sysram, node_states[N_MEMORY]);
}
/**
@@ -2723,7 +2724,7 @@ void cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
cpuset_being_rebound = cs; /* causes mpol_dup() rebind */
- guarantee_online_mems(cs, &newmems);
+ guarantee_online_sysram_nodes(cs, &newmems);
/*
* The mpol_rebind_mm() call takes mmap_lock, which we couldn't
@@ -2748,7 +2749,7 @@ void cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
migrate = is_memory_migrate(cs);
- mpol_rebind_mm(mm, &cs->mems_allowed);
+ mpol_rebind_mm(mm, &cs->mems_sysram);
if (migrate)
cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, &cs->old_mems_allowed, &newmems);
else
@@ -2808,6 +2809,7 @@ static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
cp->effective_mems = *new_mems;
+ mt_nodemask_sysram_mask(&cp->mems_sysram, &cp->effective_mems);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
WARN_ON(!is_in_v2_mode() &&
@@ -3234,11 +3236,11 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
* by skipping the task iteration and update.
*/
if (cpuset_v2() && !cpus_updated && !mems_updated) {
- cpuset_attach_nodemask_to = cs->effective_mems;
+ cpuset_attach_nodemask_to = cs->mems_sysram;
goto out;
}
- guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
+ guarantee_online_sysram_nodes(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, css, tset)
cpuset_attach_task(cs, task);
@@ -3249,7 +3251,7 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
* if there is no change in effective_mems and CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE is
* not set.
*/
- cpuset_attach_nodemask_to = cs->effective_mems;
+ cpuset_attach_nodemask_to = cs->mems_sysram;
if (!is_memory_migrate(cs) && !mems_updated)
goto out;
@@ -3371,6 +3373,9 @@ int cpuset_common_seq_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
case FILE_EFFECTIVE_MEMLIST:
seq_printf(sf, "%*pbl\n", nodemask_pr_args(&cs->effective_mems));
break;
+ case FILE_MEMS_SYSRAM:
+ seq_printf(sf, "%*pbl\n", nodemask_pr_args(&cs->mems_sysram));
+ break;
case FILE_EXCLUSIVE_CPULIST:
seq_printf(sf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cs->exclusive_cpus));
break;
@@ -3482,6 +3487,12 @@ static struct cftype dfl_files[] = {
.private = FILE_EFFECTIVE_MEMLIST,
},
+ {
+ .name = "mems.sysram",
+ .seq_show = cpuset_common_seq_show,
+ .private = FILE_MEMS_SYSRAM,
+ },
+
{
.name = "cpus.partition",
.seq_show = cpuset_partition_show,
@@ -3585,6 +3596,7 @@ static int cpuset_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
if (is_in_v2_mode()) {
cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
cs->effective_mems = parent->effective_mems;
+ mt_nodemask_sysram_mask(&cs->mems_sysram, &cs->effective_mems);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
@@ -3616,6 +3628,7 @@ static int cpuset_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
cs->mems_allowed = parent->mems_allowed;
cs->effective_mems = parent->mems_allowed;
+ mt_nodemask_sysram_mask(&cs->mems_sysram, &cs->effective_mems);
cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, parent->cpus_allowed);
cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, parent->cpus_allowed);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
@@ -3769,7 +3782,7 @@ static void cpuset_fork(struct task_struct *task)
/* CLONE_INTO_CGROUP */
mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
- guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
+ guarantee_online_sysram_nodes(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
cpuset_attach_task(cs, task);
dec_attach_in_progress_locked(cs);
@@ -3818,7 +3831,8 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
cpumask_setall(top_cpuset.effective_xcpus);
cpumask_setall(top_cpuset.exclusive_cpus);
nodes_setall(top_cpuset.effective_mems);
-
+ mt_nodemask_sysram_mask(&top_cpuset.mems_sysram,
+ &top_cpuset.effective_mems);
fmeter_init(&top_cpuset.fmeter);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&remote_children);
@@ -3848,6 +3862,7 @@ hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs,
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, new_cpus);
cs->effective_mems = *new_mems;
+ mt_nodemask_sysram_mask(&cs->mems_sysram, &cs->effective_mems);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
if (cpus_updated)
@@ -4039,6 +4054,8 @@ static void cpuset_handle_hotplug(void)
if (!on_dfl)
top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems;
top_cpuset.effective_mems = new_mems;
+ mt_nodemask_sysram_mask(&top_cpuset.mems_sysram,
+ &top_cpuset.effective_mems);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask(&top_cpuset);
}
@@ -4109,6 +4126,8 @@ void __init cpuset_init_smp(void)
cpumask_copy(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
top_cpuset.effective_mems = node_states[N_MEMORY];
+ mt_nodemask_sysram_mask(&top_cpuset.mems_sysram,
+ &top_cpuset.effective_mems);
hotplug_node_notifier(cpuset_track_online_nodes, CPUSET_CALLBACK_PRI);
@@ -4205,14 +4224,18 @@ bool cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *tsk)
return changed;
}
+/*
+ * At this point in time, no hotplug nodes can have been added, so just set
+ * the sysram_nodes of the init task to the set of N_MEMORY nodes.
+ */
void __init cpuset_init_current_sysram_nodes(void)
{
- nodes_setall(current->sysram_nodes);
+ current->sysram_nodes = node_states[N_MEMORY];
}
/**
- * cpuset_mems_allowed - return mems_allowed mask from a tasks cpuset.
- * @tsk: pointer to task_struct from which to obtain cpuset->mems_allowed.
+ * cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed - return mems_sysram mask from a tasks cpuset.
+ * @tsk: pointer to task_struct from which to obtain cpuset->mems_sysram.
*
* Description: Returns the nodemask_t mems_allowed of the cpuset
* attached to the specified @tsk. Guaranteed to return some non-empty
@@ -4220,13 +4243,13 @@ void __init cpuset_init_current_sysram_nodes(void)
* tasks cpuset.
**/
-nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
+nodemask_t cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
nodemask_t mask;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
- guarantee_online_mems(task_cs(tsk), &mask);
+ guarantee_online_sysram_nodes(task_cs(tsk), &mask);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
return mask;
@@ -4295,17 +4318,30 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
* tsk_is_oom_victim - any node ok
* GFP_KERNEL - any node in enclosing hardwalled cpuset ok
* GFP_USER - only nodes in current tasks mems allowed ok.
+ * GFP_SPM_NODE - allow specific purpose memory nodes in mems_allowed
*/
bool cpuset_current_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
struct cpuset *cs; /* current cpuset ancestors */
bool allowed; /* is allocation in zone z allowed? */
unsigned long flags;
+ bool sp_node = gfp_mask & __GFP_SPM_NODE;
+ /* Only SysRAM nodes are valid in interrupt context */
if (in_interrupt())
- return true;
- if (node_isset(node, current->sysram_nodes))
- return true;
+ return (!sp_node || node_isset(node, mt_sysram_nodelist));
+
+ if (sp_node) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ cs = task_cs(current);
+ allowed = node_isset(node, cs->mems_allowed);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ } else
+ allowed = node_isset(node, current->sysram_nodes);
+
+ if (allowed)
+ return allowed;
+
/*
* Allow tasks that have access to memory reserves because they have
* been OOM killed to get memory anywhere.
@@ -4324,11 +4360,15 @@ bool cpuset_current_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
cs = nearest_hardwall_ancestor(task_cs(current));
allowed = node_isset(node, cs->mems_allowed);
+ /* If not a SP Node allocation, restrict to sysram nodes */
+ if (!sp_node && !nodes_empty(mt_sysram_nodelist))
+ allowed &= node_isset(node, mt_sysram_nodelist);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
return allowed;
}
-bool cpuset_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
+bool cpuset_sysram_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
struct cpuset *cs;
@@ -4347,7 +4387,7 @@ bool cpuset_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
return true;
/*
- * Normally, accessing effective_mems would require the cpuset_mutex
+ * Normally, accessing mems_sysram would require the cpuset_mutex
* or callback_lock - but node_isset is atomic and the reference
* taken via cgroup_get_e_css is sufficient to protect css.
*
@@ -4359,7 +4399,7 @@ bool cpuset_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
* cannot make strong isolation guarantees, so this is acceptable.
*/
cs = container_of(css, struct cpuset, css);
- allowed = node_isset(nid, cs->effective_mems);
+ allowed = node_isset(nid, cs->mems_sysram);
css_put(css);
return allowed;
}
@@ -4380,7 +4420,7 @@ bool cpuset_node_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, int nid)
* We don't have to worry about the returned node being offline
* because "it can't happen", and even if it did, it would be ok.
*
- * The routines calling guarantee_online_mems() are careful to
+ * The routines calling guarantee_online_sysram_nodes() are careful to
* only set nodes in task->sysram_nodes that are online. So it
* should not be possible for the following code to return an
* offline node. But if it did, that would be ok, as this routine
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 4deda33625f4..7cac7ff013a7 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5599,5 +5599,6 @@ subsys_initcall(mem_cgroup_swap_init);
bool mem_cgroup_node_allowed(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
{
- return memcg ? cpuset_node_allowed(memcg->css.cgroup, nid) : true;
+ return memcg ? cpuset_sysram_node_allowed(memcg->css.cgroup, nid) :
+ true;
}
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 735dabb9c50c..e1e8a1f3e1a2 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1831,14 +1831,14 @@ static int kernel_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, unsigned long maxnode,
}
rcu_read_unlock();
- task_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(task);
+ task_nodes = cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(task);
/* Is the user allowed to access the target nodes? */
if (!nodes_subset(*new, task_nodes) && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
err = -EPERM;
goto out_put;
}
- task_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(current);
+ task_nodes = cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(current);
nodes_and(*new, *new, task_nodes);
if (nodes_empty(*new))
goto out_put;
@@ -2763,7 +2763,7 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old)
*new = *old;
if (current_cpuset_is_being_rebound()) {
- nodemask_t mems = cpuset_mems_allowed(current);
+ nodemask_t mems = cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(current);
mpol_rebind_policy(new, &mems);
}
atomic_set(&new->refcnt, 1);
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index c0e9f15be2a2..c612f05d23db 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *find_mm_struct(pid_t pid, nodemask_t *mem_nodes)
*/
if (!pid) {
mmget(current->mm);
- *mem_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(current);
+ *mem_nodes = cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(current);
return current->mm;
}
@@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *find_mm_struct(pid_t pid, nodemask_t *mem_nodes)
mm = ERR_PTR(security_task_movememory(task));
if (IS_ERR(mm))
goto out;
- *mem_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(task);
+ *mem_nodes = cpuset_sysram_nodes_allowed(task);
mm = get_task_mm(task);
out:
put_task_struct(task);
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 19:29 [RFC LPC2026 PATCH v2 00/11] Specific Purpose Memory NUMA Nodes Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] mm: constify oom_control, scan_control, and alloc_context nodemask Gregory Price
2025-12-15 6:11 ` Balbir Singh
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] mm: change callers of __cpuset_zone_allowed to cpuset_zone_allowed Gregory Price
2025-12-15 6:14 ` Balbir Singh
2025-12-15 12:38 ` Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] gfp: Add GFP_SPM_NODE for Specific Purpose Memory (SPM) allocations Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] memory-tiers: Introduce SysRAM and Specific Purpose Memory Nodes Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] mm: restrict slub, oom, compaction, and page_alloc to sysram by default Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] mm,cpusets: rename task->mems_allowed to task->sysram_nodes Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] mm/memory_hotplug: add MHP_SPM_NODE flag Gregory Price
2025-11-13 14:58 ` [PATCH] memory-tiers: multi-definition fixup Gregory Price
2025-11-13 16:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] drivers/dax: add spm_node bit to dev_dax Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] drivers/cxl: add spm_node bit to cxl region Gregory Price
2025-11-12 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] [HACK] mm/zswap: compressed ram integration example Gregory Price
2025-11-18 7:02 ` [RFC LPC2026 PATCH v2 00/11] Specific Purpose Memory NUMA Nodes Alistair Popple
2025-11-18 10:36 ` Gregory Price
2025-11-21 21:07 ` Gregory Price
2025-11-23 23:09 ` Alistair Popple
2025-11-24 15:28 ` Gregory Price
2025-11-27 5:03 ` Alistair Popple
2025-11-24 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 18:06 ` Gregory Price
2025-12-10 23:29 ` Yiannis Nikolakopoulos
2025-11-25 14:09 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-25 15:05 ` Gregory Price
2025-11-27 5:12 ` Alistair Popple
2025-11-26 3:23 ` Balbir Singh
2025-11-26 8:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-12-03 4:36 ` Balbir Singh
2025-12-03 5:25 ` Gregory Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251112192936.2574429-8-gourry@gourry.net \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com \
--cc=escape@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox