linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] mempool: add mempool_{alloc,free}_bulk
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:00:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251106150049.GA16252@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f933b80c-0170-4c0c-bf91-7c862127e96d@suse.cz>

On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 03:57:13PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > I think the only reason mempool_alloc even allows !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
> > is to avoid special casing that in callers that have a non-constant
> > gfp mask.  So maybe the best thing would be to never actually go to
> > the pool for them and just give up if alloc_fn fails?
> 
> Yeah, but I guess we could keep trying the pool for the single allocation
> case as that's simple enough, just not for the bulk.

Doing that will be quite a bit more complicated I think.  And given
that the !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM handlers must be able to handle failure
I'm also not sure that using the pool is all that useful.



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-06 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31  9:34 move blk-crypto-fallback to sit above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] mempool: update kerneldoc comments Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:02   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-05 14:14     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:26   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] mempool: add error injection support Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:29   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] mempool: add mempool_{alloc,free}_bulk Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:27       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:57           ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 15:00             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-06 15:09               ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:52   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] fscrypt: pass a real sector_t to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  3:55   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] fscrypt: keep multiple bios in flight in fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:06   ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-crypto: optimize bio splitting in blk_crypto_fallback_encrypt_bio Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:22   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] blk-crypto: handle the fallback above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:42   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:37   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] blk-crypto: use on-stack skciphers for fallback en/decryption Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:18   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:32   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] blk-crypto: use mempool_alloc_bulk for encrypted bio page allocation Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:12   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:01     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251106150049.GA16252@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox