linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] slab: prevent infinite loop in kmalloc_nolock() with debugging
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 13:24:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103-fix-nolock-loop-v1-1-6e2b3e82b9da@suse.cz> (raw)

In review of a followup work, Harry noticed a potential infinite loop.
Upon closed inspection, it already exists for kmalloc_nolock() on a
cache with debugging enabled, since commit af92793e52c3 ("slab:
Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().")

When alloc_single_from_new_slab() fails to trylock node list_lock, we
keep retrying to get partial slab or allocate a new slab. If we indeed
interrupted somebody holding the list_lock, the trylock fill fail
deterministically and we end up allocating and defer-freeing slabs
indefinitely with no progress.

To fix it, fail the allocation if spinning is not allowed. This is
acceptable in the restricted context of kmalloc_nolock(), especially
with debugging enabled.

Reported-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aQLqZjjq1SPD3Fml@hyeyoo/
Fixes: af92793e52c3 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().")
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
as we discussed in the linked thread, 6.18 hotfix to be included in
slab/for-next-fixes
---
 mm/slub.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index d4367f25b20d..f1a5373eee7b 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4666,8 +4666,12 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
 	if (kmem_cache_debug(s)) {
 		freelist = alloc_single_from_new_slab(s, slab, orig_size, gfpflags);
 
-		if (unlikely(!freelist))
+		if (unlikely(!freelist)) {
+			/* This could cause an endless loop. Fail instead. */
+			if (!allow_spin)
+				return NULL;
 			goto new_objects;
+		}
 
 		if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
 			set_track(s, freelist, TRACK_ALLOC, addr,

---
base-commit: 6146a0f1dfae5d37442a9ddcba012add260bceb0
change-id: 20251103-fix-nolock-loop-854e0101672f

Best regards,
-- 
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>



             reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 12:24 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-11-03 18:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-04  5:26 ` Dev Jain
2025-11-04 10:24   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-04 10:35     ` Dev Jain
2025-11-06  3:41 ` Harry Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251103-fix-nolock-loop-v1-1-6e2b3e82b9da@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox