From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: merge uniform_split_supported() and non_uniform_split_supported()
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 02:11:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251101021145.3676-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> (raw)
The functions uniform_split_supported() and
non_uniform_split_supported() share significantly similar logic.
The only functional difference is that uniform_split_supported()
includes an additional check on the requested @new_order before
proceeding with further validation.
This commit unifies the logic by introducing a new variable,
@need_check, which is conditionally set based on whether a uniform
split is requested. This allows us to merge the two functions into
a single, combined helper, removing redundant code and simplifying
the split support checking mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 8 +++---
mm/huge_memory.c | 55 +++++++++++------------------------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index cbb2243f8e56..79343809a7be 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -369,10 +369,8 @@ int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list
unsigned int new_order, bool unmapped);
int min_order_for_split(struct folio *folio);
int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
-bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
- bool warns);
-bool non_uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
- bool warns);
+bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
+ bool uniform_split, bool warns);
int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, struct page *page,
struct list_head *list);
@@ -403,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int split_huge_page_to_order(struct page *page, unsigned int new_o
static inline int try_folio_split_to_order(struct folio *folio,
struct page *page, unsigned int new_order)
{
- if (!non_uniform_split_supported(folio, new_order, /* warns= */ false))
+ if (!folio_split_supported(folio, new_order, /* uniform_split = */ false, /* warns= */ false))
return split_huge_page_to_order(&folio->page, new_order);
return folio_split(folio, new_order, page, NULL);
}
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index d1fa0d2d9b44..f6d2cb2a5ca0 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3673,55 +3673,34 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
return 0;
}
-bool non_uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
- bool warns)
+bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
+ bool uniform_split, bool warns)
{
- if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
- /* order-1 is not supported for anonymous THP. */
- VM_WARN_ONCE(warns && new_order == 1,
- "Cannot split to order-1 folio");
- return new_order != 1;
- } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS) &&
- !mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) {
- /*
- * No split if the file system does not support large folio.
- * Note that we might still have THPs in such mappings due to
- * CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS. But in that case, the mapping
- * does not actually support large folios properly.
- */
- VM_WARN_ONCE(warns,
- "Cannot split file folio to non-0 order");
- return false;
- }
-
- /* Only swapping a whole PMD-mapped folio is supported */
- if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
- VM_WARN_ONCE(warns,
- "Cannot split swapcache folio to non-0 order");
- return false;
- }
+ bool need_check = uniform_split ? new_order : true;
- return true;
-}
-
-/* See comments in non_uniform_split_supported() */
-bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
- bool warns)
-{
if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
+ /* order-1 is not supported for anonymous THP. */
VM_WARN_ONCE(warns && new_order == 1,
"Cannot split to order-1 folio");
return new_order != 1;
- } else if (new_order) {
+ } else if (need_check) {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS) &&
!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) {
+ /*
+ * No split if the file system does not support large
+ * folio. Note that we might still have THPs in such
+ * mappings due to CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS. But in
+ * that case, the mapping does not actually support
+ * large folios properly.
+ */
VM_WARN_ONCE(warns,
"Cannot split file folio to non-0 order");
return false;
}
}
- if (new_order && folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
+ /* Only swapping a whole PMD-mapped folio is supported */
+ if (need_check && folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
VM_WARN_ONCE(warns,
"Cannot split swapcache folio to non-0 order");
return false;
@@ -3779,11 +3758,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
if (new_order >= old_order)
return -EINVAL;
- if (uniform_split && !uniform_split_supported(folio, new_order, true))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!uniform_split &&
- !non_uniform_split_supported(folio, new_order, true))
+ if (!folio_split_supported(folio, new_order, uniform_split, /* warn = */ true))
return -EINVAL;
is_hzp = is_huge_zero_folio(folio);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-01 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-01 2:11 Wei Yang [this message]
2025-11-03 9:04 ` Dev Jain
2025-11-03 16:19 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-03 11:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-04 0:41 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-04 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-04 13:31 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-03 16:34 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-04 0:36 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-04 2:30 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-04 7:53 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-05 2:14 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-05 2:44 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251101021145.3676-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox