linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] fscrypt: keep multiple bios in flight in fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:34:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251031093517.1603379-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251031093517.1603379-1-hch@lst.de>

This should slightly improve performance for large zeroing operations,
but more importantly prepares for blk-crypto refactoring that requires
all fscrypt users to call submit_bio directly.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/crypto/bio.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/crypto/bio.c b/fs/crypto/bio.c
index 68b0424d879a..e59d342b4240 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/bio.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/bio.c
@@ -47,49 +47,71 @@ bool fscrypt_decrypt_bio(struct bio *bio)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_decrypt_bio);
 
+struct fscrypt_zero_done {
+	atomic_t		pending;
+	blk_status_t		status;
+	struct completion	done;
+};
+
+static void fscrypt_zeroout_range_done(struct fscrypt_zero_done *done)
+{
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&done->pending))
+		complete(&done->done);
+}
+
+static void fscrypt_zeroout_range_end_io(struct bio *bio)
+{
+	struct fscrypt_zero_done *done = bio->bi_private;
+
+	if (bio->bi_status)
+		cmpxchg(&done->status, 0, bio->bi_status);
+	fscrypt_zeroout_range_done(done);
+	bio_put(bio);
+}
+
 static int fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt(const struct inode *inode,
 					      pgoff_t lblk, sector_t sector,
 					      unsigned int len)
 {
 	const unsigned int blockbits = inode->i_blkbits;
 	const unsigned int blocks_per_page = 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - blockbits);
-	struct bio *bio;
-	int ret, err = 0;
-	int num_pages = 0;
+	struct fscrypt_zero_done done = {};
 
-	/* This always succeeds since __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is set. */
-	bio = bio_alloc(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, BIO_MAX_VECS, REQ_OP_WRITE,
-			GFP_NOFS);
+	atomic_set(&done.pending, 1);
+	init_completion(&done.done);
 
 	while (len) {
-		unsigned int blocks_this_page = min(len, blocks_per_page);
-		unsigned int bytes_this_page = blocks_this_page << blockbits;
+		struct bio *bio;
+		unsigned int n;
 
-		if (num_pages == 0) {
-			fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(bio, inode, lblk, GFP_NOFS);
-			bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
-		}
-		ret = bio_add_page(bio, ZERO_PAGE(0), bytes_this_page, 0);
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret != bytes_this_page)) {
-			err = -EIO;
-			goto out;
-		}
-		num_pages++;
-		len -= blocks_this_page;
-		lblk += blocks_this_page;
-		sector += (bytes_this_page >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
-		if (num_pages == BIO_MAX_VECS || !len ||
-		    !fscrypt_mergeable_bio(bio, inode, lblk)) {
-			err = submit_bio_wait(bio);
-			if (err)
-				goto out;
-			bio_reset(bio, inode->i_sb->s_bdev, REQ_OP_WRITE);
-			num_pages = 0;
+		bio = bio_alloc(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, BIO_MAX_VECS, REQ_OP_WRITE,
+				GFP_NOFS);
+		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
+		bio->bi_private = &done;
+		bio->bi_end_io = fscrypt_zeroout_range_end_io;
+		fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(bio, inode, lblk, GFP_NOFS);
+
+		for (n = 0; n < BIO_MAX_VECS; n++) {
+			unsigned int blocks_this_page =
+				min(len, blocks_per_page);
+			unsigned int bytes_this_page = blocks_this_page << blockbits;
+
+			__bio_add_page(bio, ZERO_PAGE(0), bytes_this_page, 0);
+			len -= blocks_this_page;
+			lblk += blocks_this_page;
+			sector += (bytes_this_page >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
+			if (!len || !fscrypt_mergeable_bio(bio, inode, lblk))
+				break;
 		}
+
+		atomic_inc(&done.pending);
+		submit_bio(bio);
 	}
-out:
-	bio_put(bio);
-	return err;
+
+	fscrypt_zeroout_range_done(&done);
+
+	wait_for_completion(&done.done);
+	return blk_status_to_errno(done.status);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.47.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-31  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31  9:34 move blk-crypto-fallback to sit above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] mempool: update kerneldoc comments Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:02   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-05 14:14     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:26   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] mempool: add error injection support Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:29   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] mempool: add mempool_{alloc,free}_bulk Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:27       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:57           ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 15:00             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 15:09               ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-07  3:52   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] fscrypt: pass a real sector_t to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  3:55   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-07  4:06   ` [PATCH 5/9] fscrypt: keep multiple bios in flight in fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt Eric Biggers
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-crypto: optimize bio splitting in blk_crypto_fallback_encrypt_bio Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:22   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] blk-crypto: handle the fallback above the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:42   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:37   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] blk-crypto: use on-stack skciphers for fallback en/decryption Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-07  4:18   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-07 12:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  0:32   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-14  5:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31  9:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] blk-crypto: use mempool_alloc_bulk for encrypted bio page allocation Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 15:12   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-06 14:01     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251031093517.1603379-6-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox