From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FF0CCF9E3 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 85F058E00B3; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:12:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 836D18E0042; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:12:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 79ACF8E00B3; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:12:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF708E0042 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:12:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DA54985B for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:12:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84033349974.16.9A127EE Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB9C1C0002 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lst.de ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1761318765; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=v1uZoGVkj7b6JAu9wLFwP+21XWqnCCB2RUe0+v7Ku3oWxHTYlXBCkl9sJqo1E7JkJT2WlC 6CPiHdG+k7yad+RFSd3gy840pOx7ZOaWzGevgf8rJlaERkAht4tWYXfrNj9cLyCDpzJtFE b8yUcCg6FMA8egNHcJ+R6aUeIJAgYbg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lst.de ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1761318765; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=i+ccLUlFUYhj92tCzyrNYXPU2QKCgamjHaO1CQKdmNc=; b=ZojTE5HzbqRzIgJIpKh5pIdirFfWwseGT3+c39vr91XtPDpbbEXOgmZab0RJgL7vNPO0/F Cdl161/FtTg/GEzjgv1S7jCxh3yqW7e5qFWl2LyHb81hBbyY2znu8a7aCY2TuZfZ9z39Yw o3lFhUwTji4E7IB8eSnR/GmyJHS4WKQ= Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 50D9D227AAA; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 17:12:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 17:12:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Carlos Maiolino , Andrew Morton , willy@infradead.org, dlemoal@kernel.org, hans.holmberg@wdc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] writeback: allow the file system to override MIN_WRITEBACK_PAGES Message-ID: <20251024151237.GA1491@lst.de> References: <20251017034611.651385-1-hch@lst.de> <20251017034611.651385-3-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Stat-Signature: xys9h74s79hsmmnohyhqpec5yeowrpgb X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2DB9C1C0002 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1761318764-360282 X-HE-Meta: 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 08:03:34PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote: > So this patch doesn't really explicitly set s_min_writeback_pages to a non-default/overridden value, > right? That is being done in the next patch, isn't it? Exactly.