linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	graf@amazon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	masahiroy@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	rppt@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, jasonmiu@google.com,
	dmatlack@google.com, skhawaja@google.com, glider@google.com,
	elver@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] liveupdate: kho: allocate metadata directly from the buddy allocator
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:20:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251024142014.GC760669@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bA_Qb9csWvEQb-zpxgMg7vy+gw9eh0z88QBEdiFdtopMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 09:57:24AM -0400, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

> You're right the new kernel will eventually zero memory, but KHO
> preserves at page granularity. If we preserve a single slab object,
> the entire page is handed off. When the new kernel maps that page
> (e.g., to userspace) to access the preserved object, it also exposes
> the unpreserved portions of that same page. Those portions contain
> stale data from the old kernel and won't have been zeroed yet,
> creating an easy-to-miss data leak vector. 

Do we zero any of the memory on KHO? Honestly, I wouldn't worry about
the point it zeros, slab guarentees it will be zero when it should be
zero.

> There's also the inefficiency. The unpreserved parts of that page are
> unusable by the new kernel until the preserved object is freed.

Thats not how I see slab preservation working. When the slab page
is unpreserved all the free space in that page should be immediately
available to the sucessor kernel.

> As I see it, the only robust solution is to use a special GFP flag.
> This would force these allocations to come from a dedicated pool of
> pages that are fully preserved, with no partial/mixed-use pages and
> also retrieved as slabs.

It is certainly more efficient to preserve fewer slab pages in total
and pooling would help get there.

> That said, I'm not sure preserving individual slab objects is a high
> priority right now. It might be simpler to avoid it altogether.

I think we will need something, a lot of the structs I'm seeing in
other patches are small and allocating a whole page is pretty wasteful
too.

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-15  5:31 [PATCH 0/2] KHO: Fix metadata allocation in scratch area Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15  5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] liveupdate: kho: warn and fail on metadata or preserved memory " Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15  8:21   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-15 12:36     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-16 17:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-18 15:31         ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-18 15:28       ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 12:10   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-15 12:40     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 13:11       ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-15  5:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] liveupdate: kho: allocate metadata directly from the buddy allocator Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15  8:37   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-15 12:46     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 13:05   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-15 14:19     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 14:36       ` Alexander Potapenko
2025-10-24 13:25       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-24 13:57         ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 14:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-10-24 14:36             ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 14:55               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-24 15:06                 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 14:22     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 13:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251024142014.GC760669@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jasonmiu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox