From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] slab: Fix obj_ext is mistakenly considered NULL due to race condition
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:21:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251023012117.890883-1-hao.ge@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
If two competing threads enter alloc_slab_obj_exts(), and the
thread that failed to allocate the object extension vector exits
after the one that succeeded, it will mistakenly assume slab->obj_ext
is still empty due to its own allocation failure. This will then trigger
warnings enforced by CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG checks in
the subsequent free path.
Therefore, let's add an additional check when alloc_slab_obj_exts fails.
Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
---
mm/slub.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index d4403341c9df..42276f0cc920 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2227,9 +2227,12 @@ prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, void *p)
slab = virt_to_slab(p);
if (!slab_obj_exts(slab) &&
alloc_slab_obj_exts(slab, s, flags, false)) {
- pr_warn_once("%s, %s: Failed to create slab extension vector!\n",
- __func__, s->name);
- return NULL;
+ /* Recheck if a racing thread has successfully allocated slab->obj_exts. */
+ if (!slab_obj_exts(slab)) {
+ pr_warn_once("%s, %s: Failed to create slab extension vector!\n",
+ __func__, s->name);
+ return NULL;
+ }
}
return slab_obj_exts(slab) + obj_to_index(s, slab, p);
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 1:21 Hao Ge [this message]
2025-10-23 2:24 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-23 3:11 ` Hao Ge
2025-10-23 7:50 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-23 8:23 ` Hao Ge
2025-10-23 8:46 ` Hao Ge
2025-10-23 9:06 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-23 9:11 ` Hao Ge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251023012117.890883-1-hao.ge@linux.dev \
--to=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=gehao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox