From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
<Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: mprotect: convert to folio_needs_prot_numa()
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:18:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251020061845.3347258-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020061845.3347258-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
The prot_numa_skip() naming is not good since it updates the folio
access time except checking whether to skip prot NUMA, so rename it
to folio_needs_prot_numa(), and cleanup it a bit, remove ret by
directly return value instead of goto style, also make it non-static
function so that it can be reused.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
mm/internal.h | 3 +++
mm/mprotect.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 6691d3ea55af..b521b5177d3c 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -1403,6 +1403,9 @@ int numa_migrate_check(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf,
unsigned long addr, int *flags, bool writable,
int *last_cpupid);
+bool folio_needs_prot_numa(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ int target_node);
+
void free_zone_device_folio(struct folio *folio);
int migrate_device_coherent_folio(struct folio *folio);
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 6236d120c8e6..1369ba6f6294 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -118,26 +118,30 @@ static int mprotect_folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, pte_t *ptep,
return folio_pte_batch_flags(folio, NULL, ptep, &pte, max_nr_ptes, flags);
}
-static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int target_node,
- struct folio *folio)
+/**
+ * folio_needs_prot_numa() - Whether the folio needs prot numa
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ * @vma: The VMA mapping.
+ * @target_node: The numa node being accessed.
+ *
+ * Return: True if folio needs prot numa and the access time of
+ * folio is adjusted. False otherwise.
+ */
+bool folio_needs_prot_numa(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ int target_node)
{
- bool ret = true;
- bool toptier;
int nid;
- if (!folio)
- goto skip;
-
- if (folio_is_zone_device(folio) || folio_test_ksm(folio))
- goto skip;
+ if (!folio || folio_is_zone_device(folio) || folio_test_ksm(folio))
+ return false;
/* Also skip shared copy-on-write folios */
if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) && folio_maybe_mapped_shared(folio))
- goto skip;
+ return false;
/* Folios are pinned and can't be migrated */
if (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio))
- goto skip;
+ return false;
/*
* While migration can move some dirty pages,
@@ -145,7 +149,7 @@ static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int target_node,
* context.
*/
if (folio_is_file_lru(folio) && folio_test_dirty(folio))
- goto skip;
+ return false;
/*
* Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
@@ -153,23 +157,20 @@ static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int target_node,
*/
nid = folio_nid(folio);
if (target_node == nid)
- goto skip;
-
- toptier = node_is_toptier(nid);
+ return false;
/*
* Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
* balancing is disabled
*/
- if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) && toptier)
- goto skip;
+ if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
+ node_is_toptier(nid))
+ return false;
- ret = false;
if (folio_use_access_time(folio))
folio_xchg_access_time(folio, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies));
-skip:
- return ret;
+ return true;
}
/* Set nr_ptes number of ptes, starting from idx */
@@ -315,7 +316,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
* pages. See similar comment in change_huge_pmd.
*/
if (prot_numa &&
- prot_numa_skip(vma, target_node, folio)) {
+ !folio_needs_prot_numa(folio, vma, target_node)) {
/* determine batch to skip */
nr_ptes = mprotect_folio_pte_batch(folio,
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 6:18 [PATCH v4 0/4] mm: some optimizations for prot numa Kefeng Wang
2025-10-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: mprotect: always skip dma pinned folio in prot_numa_skip() Kefeng Wang
2025-10-21 3:06 ` Barry Song
2025-10-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm: mprotect: avoid unnecessary struct page accessing if pte_protnone() Kefeng Wang
2025-10-20 12:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-20 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 6:18 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2025-10-20 13:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: mprotect: convert to folio_needs_prot_numa() David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 13:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-20 15:14 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-10-20 17:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 17:49 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-20 18:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 18:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-21 8:41 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-10-21 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21 9:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-21 9:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-21 12:54 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-10-21 14:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-21 15:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21 16:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-22 0:51 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-10-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm: huge_memory: use folio_needs_prot_numa() for pmd folio Kefeng Wang
2025-10-20 13:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 13:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-20 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-20 15:18 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-10-21 13:37 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-10-21 15:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-21 15:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-22 1:33 ` Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251020061845.3347258-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox