linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: linmiaohe@huawei.com, david@redhat.com, jane.chu@oracle.com,
	kernel@pankajraghav.com,
	syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Cc: ziy@nvidia.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mcgrof@kernel.org,
	nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/huge_memory: fix kernel-doc comments for folio_split() and related.
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 23:34:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251016033452.125479-4-ziy@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251016033452.125479-1-ziy@nvidia.com>

try_folio_split_to_order(), folio_split, __folio_split(), and
__split_unmapped_folio() do not have correct kernel-doc comment format.
Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
 include/linux/huge_mm.h | 10 ++++++----
 mm/huge_memory.c        | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 3d9587f40c0b..1a1b9ed50acc 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -382,9 +382,9 @@ static inline int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct lis
 	return __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, list, new_order, false);
 }
 
-/*
- * try_folio_split_to_order - try to split a @folio at @page to @new_order using
- * non uniform split.
+/**
+ * try_folio_split_to_order() - try to split a @folio at @page to @new_order
+ * using non uniform split.
  * @folio: folio to be split
  * @page: split to @order at the given page
  * @new_order: the target split order
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static inline int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct lis
  * folios are put back to LRU list. Use min_order_for_split() to get the lower
  * bound of @new_order.
  *
- * Return: 0: split is successful, otherwise split failed.
+ * Return: 0 - split is successful, otherwise split failed.
  */
 static inline int try_folio_split_to_order(struct folio *folio,
 		struct page *page, unsigned int new_order)
@@ -483,6 +483,8 @@ static inline spinlock_t *pud_trans_huge_lock(pud_t *pud,
 /**
  * folio_test_pmd_mappable - Can we map this folio with a PMD?
  * @folio: The folio to test
+ *
+ * Return: true - @folio can be mapped, false - @folio cannot be mapped.
  */
 static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
 {
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index f308f11dc72f..89179711539e 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3552,8 +3552,9 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
 		ClearPageCompound(&folio->page);
 }
 
-/*
- * It splits an unmapped @folio to lower order smaller folios in two ways.
+/**
+ * __split_unmapped_folio() - splits an unmapped @folio to lower order folios in
+ * two ways: uniform split or non-uniform split.
  * @folio: the to-be-split folio
  * @new_order: the smallest order of the after split folios (since buddy
  *             allocator like split generates folios with orders from @folio's
@@ -3588,8 +3589,8 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
  * folio containing @page. The caller needs to unlock and/or free after-split
  * folios if necessary.
  *
- * For !uniform_split, when -ENOMEM is returned, the original folio might be
- * split. The caller needs to check the input folio.
+ * Return: 0 - successful, <0 - failed (if -ENOMEM is returned, @folio might be
+ * split but not to @new_order, the caller needs to check)
  */
 static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
 		struct page *split_at, struct xa_state *xas,
@@ -3703,8 +3704,8 @@ bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
 	return true;
 }
 
-/*
- * __folio_split: split a folio at @split_at to a @new_order folio
+/**
+ * __folio_split() - split a folio at @split_at to a @new_order folio
  * @folio: folio to split
  * @new_order: the order of the new folio
  * @split_at: a page within the new folio
@@ -3722,7 +3723,7 @@ bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
  * 1. for uniform split, @lock_at points to one of @folio's subpages;
  * 2. for buddy allocator like (non-uniform) split, @lock_at points to @folio.
  *
- * return: 0: successful, <0 failed (if -ENOMEM is returned, @folio might be
+ * Return: 0 - successful, <0 - failed (if -ENOMEM is returned, @folio might be
  * split but not to @new_order, the caller needs to check)
  */
 static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
@@ -4111,14 +4112,13 @@ int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list
 				unmapped);
 }
 
-/*
- * folio_split: split a folio at @split_at to a @new_order folio
+/**
+ * folio_split() - split a folio at @split_at to a @new_order folio
  * @folio: folio to split
  * @new_order: the order of the new folio
  * @split_at: a page within the new folio
- *
- * return: 0: successful, <0 failed (if -ENOMEM is returned, @folio might be
- * split but not to @new_order, the caller needs to check)
+ * @list: after-split folios are added to @list if not null, otherwise to LRU
+ *        list
  *
  * It has the same prerequisites and returns as
  * split_huge_page_to_list_to_order().
@@ -4132,6 +4132,9 @@ int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list
  * [order-4, {order-3}, order-3, order-5, order-6, order-7, order-8].
  *
  * After split, folio is left locked for caller.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 - successful, <0 - failed (if -ENOMEM is returned, @folio might be
+ * split but not to @new_order, the caller needs to check)
  */
 int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
 		struct page *split_at, struct list_head *list)
-- 
2.51.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-16  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16  3:34 [PATCH v2 0/3] Do not change split folio target order Zi Yan
2025-10-16  3:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/huge_memory: do not change split_huge_page*() target order silently Zi Yan
2025-10-16  7:31   ` Wei Yang
2025-10-16 14:32     ` Zi Yan
2025-10-16 20:59       ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-17  1:03         ` Zi Yan
2025-10-17  9:06           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-17  9:10             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-17 14:16               ` Zi Yan
2025-10-17 14:32                 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-18  0:05                   ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-17  1:01       ` Wei Yang
2025-10-16  3:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/memory-failure: improve large block size folio handling Zi Yan
2025-10-17  9:33   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-20 20:09     ` Zi Yan
2025-10-17 19:11   ` Yang Shi
2025-10-20 19:46     ` Zi Yan
2025-10-20 23:41       ` Yang Shi
2025-10-21  1:23         ` Zi Yan
2025-10-21 15:44           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21 15:55             ` Zi Yan
2025-10-21 18:28               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21 18:57                 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-21 19:07                   ` Yang Shi
2025-10-22  6:39       ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-16  3:34 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-10-17  9:20   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/huge_memory: fix kernel-doc comments for folio_split() and related Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251016033452.125479-4-ziy@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox