From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
Cc: <AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@arm.com>, <Michael.Day@amd.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <bharata@amd.com>,
<dave.hansen@intel.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
<dongjoo.linux.dev@gmail.com>, <feng.tang@intel.com>,
<gourry@gourry.net>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <honggyu.kim@sk.com>,
<hughd@google.com>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
<k.shutemov@gmail.com>, <kbusch@meta.com>,
<kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com>, <leesuyeon0506@gmail.com>,
<leillc@google.com>, <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<mgorman@techsingularity.net>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<nadav.amit@gmail.com>, <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <riel@surriel.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
<rppt@kernel.org>, <santosh.shukla@amd.com>, <shivankg@amd.com>,
<shy828301@gmail.com>, <sj@kernel.org>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
<weixugc@google.com>, <willy@infradead.org>,
<ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
<dave@stgolabs.net>, <yuanchu@google.com>, <kinseyho@google.com>,
<hdanton@sina.com>, <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 08/17] mm: Add throttling of mm scanning using scan_size
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 10:35:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251003103556.00006e3c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814153307.1553061-9-raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:32:58 +0000
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> wrote:
> Before this patch, scanning is done on entire virtual address space
> of all the tasks. Now the scan size is shrunk or expanded based on the
> useful pages found in the last scan.
>
> This helps to quickly get out of unnecessary scanning thus burning
> lesser CPU.
>
> Drawback: If a useful chunk is at the other end of the VMA space, it
> will delay scanning and migration.
>
> Shrink/expand algorithm for scan_size:
> X : Number of useful pages in the last scan.
> Y : Number of useful pages found in current scan.
> Initial scan_size is 1GB
> case 1: (X = 0, Y = 0)
> Decrease scan_size by 2
> case 2: (X = 0, Y > 0)
> Aggressively change to MAX (4GB)
> case 3: (X > 0, Y = 0 )
> No change
> case 4: (X > 0, Y > 0)
> Increase scan_size by 2
>
> Scan size is clamped between MIN (256MB) and MAX (4GB)).
> TBD: Tuning based on real workloads
Seems like a reasonable thing to do, but as you say tuning
data needed to justify how aggressive this should be and
those size limits.
Trivial stuff inline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
> ---
> mm/kscand.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kscand.c b/mm/kscand.c
> index 843069048c61..39a7fcef7de8 100644
> --- a/mm/kscand.c
> +++ b/mm/kscand.c
> @@ -28,10 +28,15 @@
>
> static struct task_struct *kscand_thread __read_mostly;
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(kscand_mutex);
> +
Push that into earlier patch to cut down on churn / noise.
> /*
> * Total VMA size to cover during scan.
> + * Min: 256MB default: 1GB max: 4GB
> */
> +#define KSCAND_SCAN_SIZE_MIN (256 * 1024 * 1024UL)
> +#define KSCAND_SCAN_SIZE_MAX (4 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024UL)
> #define KSCAND_SCAN_SIZE (1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024UL)
> +
Likewise.
> static unsigned long kscand_scan_size __read_mostly = KSCAND_SCAN_SIZE;
>
> /*
> @@ -94,6 +99,8 @@ struct kscand_mm_slot {
> unsigned long next_scan;
> /* Tracks how many useful pages obtained for migration in the last scan */
> unsigned long scan_delta;
> + /* Determines how much VMA address space to be covered in the scanning */
> + unsigned long scan_size;
> long address;
> bool is_scanned;
> };
> static inline void kscand_update_mmslot_info(struct kscand_mm_slot *mm_slot,
> unsigned long total)
> {
> unsigned int scan_period;
> unsigned long now;
> + unsigned long scan_size;
Combining a few of these or assigning at declaration will reduce the code size a bit
which is always nice to have if it doesn't hurt readability.
> unsigned long old_scan_delta;
>
> + scan_size = mm_slot->scan_size;
> scan_period = mm_slot->scan_period;
> old_scan_delta = mm_slot->scan_delta;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-03 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 15:32 [RFC PATCH V3 00/17] mm: slowtier page promotion based on PTE A bit Raghavendra K T
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 01/17] mm: Add kscand kthread for PTE A bit scan Raghavendra K T
2025-10-02 13:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 02/17] mm: Maintain mm_struct list in the system Raghavendra K T
2025-10-02 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 03/17] mm: Scan the mm and create a migration list Raghavendra K T
2025-10-02 13:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 04/17] mm/kscand: Add only hot pages to " Raghavendra K T
2025-10-02 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 05/17] mm: Create a separate kthread for migration Raghavendra K T
2025-10-02 16:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 06/17] mm/migration: migrate accessed folios to toptier node Raghavendra K T
2025-10-02 16:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 07/17] mm: Add throttling of mm scanning using scan_period Raghavendra K T
2025-10-02 16:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 08/17] mm: Add throttling of mm scanning using scan_size Raghavendra K T
2025-10-03 9:35 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-08-14 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 09/17] mm: Add initial scan delay Raghavendra K T
2025-10-03 9:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 10/17] mm: Add a heuristic to calculate target node Raghavendra K T
2025-10-03 10:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 11/17] mm/kscand: Implement migration failure feedback Raghavendra K T
2025-10-03 10:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 12/17] sysfs: Add sysfs support to tune scanning Raghavendra K T
2025-10-03 10:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 13/17] mm/vmstat: Add vmstat counters Raghavendra K T
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 14/17] trace/kscand: Add tracing of scanning and migration Raghavendra K T
2025-10-03 10:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 15/17] prctl: Introduce new prctl to control scanning Raghavendra K T
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 16/17] prctl: Fine tune scan_period with prctl scale param Raghavendra K T
2025-08-14 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH V3 17/17] mm: Create a list of fallback target nodes Raghavendra K T
2025-08-21 15:24 ` [RFC PATCH V3 00/17] mm: slowtier page promotion based on PTE A bit Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251003103556.00006e3c@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@arm.com \
--cc=Michael.Day@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dongjoo.linux.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=k.shutemov@gmail.com \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=kinseyho@google.com \
--cc=kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=leesuyeon0506@gmail.com \
--cc=leillc@google.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox