linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	dev.jain@arm.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, usamaarif642@gmail.com,
	gutierrez.asier@huawei-partners.com, willy@infradead.org,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	21cnbao@gmail.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, rdunlap@infradead.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 mm-new 09/11] selftests/bpf: add test case to update THP policy
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:58:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250930055826.9810-10-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250930055826.9810-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

This test case exercises the BPF THP update mechanism by modifying an
existing policy. The behavior confirms that:
- EBUSY error occurs when attempting to install a new BPF program while
  another is active
- Updates to currently running programs are successfully processed

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c     | 14 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c
index 0a5a43416f2f..409ffe9e18f2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c
@@ -207,6 +207,27 @@ static void subtest_thp_eligible(void)
 	bpf_link__destroy(ops_link);
 }
 
+static void subtest_thp_policy_update(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_link *old_link, *new_link;
+	int err;
+
+	old_link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.swap_ops);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(old_link, "attach_old_link"))
+		return;
+
+	new_link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.thp_eligible_ops);
+	if (!ASSERT_NULL(new_link, "attach_new_link"))
+		goto destory_old;
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EBUSY, "attach_new_link");
+
+	err = bpf_link__update_map(old_link, skel->maps.thp_eligible_ops);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "update_old_link");
+
+destory_old:
+	bpf_link__destroy(old_link);
+}
+
 static int thp_adjust_setup(void)
 {
 	int err = -1, pmd_order;
@@ -252,6 +273,8 @@ void test_thp_adjust(void)
 
 	if (test__start_subtest("thp_eligible"))
 		subtest_thp_eligible();
+	if (test__start_subtest("policy_update"))
+		subtest_thp_policy_update();
 
 	thp_adjust_destroy();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c
index 74ad70c837ba..fc62f0c6f891 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c
@@ -39,3 +39,17 @@ SEC(".struct_ops.link")
 struct bpf_thp_ops thp_eligible_ops = {
 	.thp_get_order = (void *)thp_eligible,
 };
+
+SEC("struct_ops/thp_get_order")
+int BPF_PROG(alloc_not_in_swap, struct vm_area_struct *vma, enum tva_type type,
+	     unsigned long orders)
+{
+	if (type == TVA_SWAP_PAGEFAULT)
+		return 0;
+	return -1;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_thp_ops swap_ops = {
+	.thp_get_order = (void *)alloc_not_in_swap,
+};
-- 
2.47.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-30  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-30  5:58 [PATCH v9 mm-new 00/11] mm, bpf: BPF based THP order selection Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 01/11] mm: thp: remove vm_flags parameter from khugepaged_enter_vma() Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 02/11] mm: thp: remove vm_flags parameter from thp_vma_allowable_order() Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 03/11] mm: thp: add support for BPF based THP order selection Yafang Shao
2025-10-03  2:18   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-07  8:47     ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-08  3:25       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-08  3:50         ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-08  4:10           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-08  4:25             ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-08  4:39               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-08  6:02                 ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-08  8:08     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08  8:18       ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-08  8:28         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08  9:04           ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-08 11:27             ` Zi Yan
2025-10-08 12:06               ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-08 12:49                 ` Gutierrez Asier
2025-10-08 12:07               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 13:11                 ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-09  9:19                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09  9:59                     ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-10  7:54                       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-11  2:13                         ` Yafang Shao
2025-10-13 12:41                           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-13 13:07                             ` Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 04/11] mm: thp: decouple THP allocation between swap and page fault paths Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 05/11] mm: thp: enable THP allocation exclusively through khugepaged Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 06/11] bpf: mark mm->owner as __safe_rcu_or_null Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 07/11] bpf: mark vma->vm_mm as __safe_trusted_or_null Yafang Shao
2025-10-06 21:06   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-07  9:05     ` Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 08/11] selftests/bpf: add a simple BPF based THP policy Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 10/11] selftests/bpf: add test cases for invalid thp_adjust usage Yafang Shao
2025-09-30  5:58 ` [PATCH v9 mm-new 11/11] Documentation: add BPF-based THP policy management Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250930055826.9810-10-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gutierrez.asier@huawei-partners.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox