* [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage
@ 2025-09-30 4:33 Lance Yang
2025-09-30 4:50 ` Dev Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2025-09-30 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, david, lorenzo.stoakes
Cc: peterx, ziy, baolin.wang, baohua, ryan.roberts, dev.jain, npache,
riel, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, harry.yoo, jannh, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang, apopple,
usamaarif642, yuzhao, linux-kernel, linux-mm, ioworker0, stable,
Lance Yang
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the shared
zeropage, try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage() currently drops several important
PTE bits.
For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for
incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are
missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore.
As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped.
This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes
to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data
corruption.
Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when
creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
---
v1 -> v2:
- Avoid calling ptep_get() multiple times (per Dev)
- Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David)
- Collect Acked-by from David - thanks!
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1-lance.yang@linux.dev/
mm/migrate.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index ce83c2c3c287..50aa91d9ab4e 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
unsigned long idx)
{
struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx);
+ pte_t oldpte = ptep_get(pvmw->pte);
pte_t newpte;
if (PageCompound(page))
return false;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page);
+ VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(oldpte), page);
if (folio_test_mlocked(folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) ||
mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm))
@@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address),
pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot));
+
+ if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(oldpte))
+ newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte);
+ if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(oldpte))
+ newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte);
+
set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte);
dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio));
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage 2025-09-30 4:33 [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage Lance Yang @ 2025-09-30 4:50 ` Dev Jain 2025-09-30 5:22 ` Lance Yang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Dev Jain @ 2025-09-30 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lance Yang, akpm, david, lorenzo.stoakes Cc: peterx, ziy, baolin.wang, baohua, ryan.roberts, npache, riel, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, harry.yoo, jannh, matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang, apopple, usamaarif642, yuzhao, linux-kernel, linux-mm, ioworker0, stable On 30/09/25 10:03 am, Lance Yang wrote: > From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> > > When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the shared > zeropage, try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage() currently drops several important > PTE bits. > > For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for > incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are > missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore. > > As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped. > This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes > to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data > corruption. > > Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when > creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked. > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> > Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp") > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Suggested-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> > --- > v1 -> v2: > - Avoid calling ptep_get() multiple times (per Dev) > - Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David) > - Collect Acked-by from David - thanks! > - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1-lance.yang@linux.dev/ > > mm/migrate.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > index ce83c2c3c287..50aa91d9ab4e 100644 > --- a/mm/migrate.c > +++ b/mm/migrate.c > @@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, > unsigned long idx) > { > struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx); > + pte_t oldpte = ptep_get(pvmw->pte); What I meant to say was, you can pass oldpte from remove_migration_pte to this function. Basically define old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte) in the declarations of the start of the while block in remove_migration_pte and remove the existing one. That will ensure ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration. > pte_t newpte; > > if (PageCompound(page)) > return false; > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page); > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page); > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(oldpte), page); > > if (folio_test_mlocked(folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) || > mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm)) > @@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, > > newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address), > pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); > + > + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(oldpte)) > + newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte); > + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(oldpte)) > + newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte); > + > set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte); > > dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio)); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage 2025-09-30 4:50 ` Dev Jain @ 2025-09-30 5:22 ` Lance Yang 2025-09-30 5:29 ` Dev Jain 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Lance Yang @ 2025-09-30 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dev Jain Cc: peterx, ziy, baolin.wang, baohua, ryan.roberts, npache, riel, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, harry.yoo, jannh, matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang, apopple, usamaarif642, yuzhao, lorenzo.stoakes, linux-kernel, linux-mm, ioworker0, stable, akpm, david On 2025/9/30 12:50, Dev Jain wrote: > > On 30/09/25 10:03 am, Lance Yang wrote: >> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> >> >> When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the >> shared >> zeropage, try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage() currently drops several >> important >> PTE bits. >> >> For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for >> incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are >> missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore. >> >> As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped. >> This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes >> to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data >> corruption. >> >> Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when >> creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked. >> >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> >> Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage >> when splitting isolated thp") >> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >> Suggested-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> >> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> >> --- >> v1 -> v2: >> - Avoid calling ptep_get() multiple times (per Dev) >> - Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David) >> - Collect Acked-by from David - thanks! >> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1- >> lance.yang@linux.dev/ >> >> mm/migrate.c | 9 ++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c >> index ce83c2c3c287..50aa91d9ab4e 100644 >> --- a/mm/migrate.c >> +++ b/mm/migrate.c >> @@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct >> page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, >> unsigned long idx) >> { >> struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx); >> + pte_t oldpte = ptep_get(pvmw->pte); > > What I meant to say was, you can pass oldpte from remove_migration_pte > to this > function. Basically define old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte) in the > declarations of > the start of the while block in remove_migration_pte and remove the > existing > one. That will ensure ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration. Ah, got it. Thanks for the clarification! IIUC, you mean something like this: ``` diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index ce83c2c3c287..bafd8cb3bebe 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list) static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, struct folio *folio, + pte_t old_pte, unsigned long idx) { struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx); @@ -306,7 +307,7 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, return false; VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page); VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page); + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(old_pte), page); if (folio_test_mlocked(folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) || mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm)) @@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address), pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); + + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(old_pte)) + newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte); + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(old_pte)) + newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte); + set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte); dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio)); @@ -344,7 +351,7 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio, while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) { rmap_t rmap_flags = RMAP_NONE; - pte_t old_pte; + pte_t old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte); pte_t pte; swp_entry_t entry; struct page *new; @@ -365,12 +372,11 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio, } #endif if (rmap_walk_arg->map_unused_to_zeropage && - try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, idx)) + try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, old_pte, idx)) continue; folio_get(folio); pte = mk_pte(new, READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot)); - old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte); entry = pte_to_swp_entry(old_pte); if (!is_migration_entry_young(entry)) ``` ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration, right? > >> pte_t newpte; >> if (PageCompound(page)) >> return false; >> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page); >> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); >> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page); >> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(oldpte), page); >> if (folio_test_mlocked(folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & >> VM_LOCKED) || >> mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm)) >> @@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct >> page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, >> newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address), >> pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); >> + >> + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(oldpte)) >> + newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte); >> + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(oldpte)) >> + newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte); >> + >> set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte); >> dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio)); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage 2025-09-30 5:22 ` Lance Yang @ 2025-09-30 5:29 ` Dev Jain 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Dev Jain @ 2025-09-30 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lance Yang Cc: peterx, ziy, baolin.wang, baohua, ryan.roberts, npache, riel, Liam.Howlett, vbabka, harry.yoo, jannh, matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang, apopple, usamaarif642, yuzhao, lorenzo.stoakes, linux-kernel, linux-mm, ioworker0, stable, akpm, david On 30/09/25 10:52 am, Lance Yang wrote: > > > On 2025/9/30 12:50, Dev Jain wrote: >> >> On 30/09/25 10:03 am, Lance Yang wrote: >>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> >>> >>> When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the >>> shared >>> zeropage, try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage() currently drops several >>> important >>> PTE bits. >>> >>> For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty >>> mechanism for >>> incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified >>> pages are >>> missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore. >>> >>> As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped. >>> This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes >>> to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to >>> data >>> corruption. >>> >>> Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when >>> creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked. >>> >>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> >>> Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage >>> when splitting isolated thp") >>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >>> Suggested-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> >>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> >>> --- >>> v1 -> v2: >>> - Avoid calling ptep_get() multiple times (per Dev) >>> - Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David) >>> - Collect Acked-by from David - thanks! >>> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1- >>> lance.yang@linux.dev/ >>> >>> mm/migrate.c | 9 ++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c >>> index ce83c2c3c287..50aa91d9ab4e 100644 >>> --- a/mm/migrate.c >>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c >>> @@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool >>> try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, >>> unsigned long idx) >>> { >>> struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx); >>> + pte_t oldpte = ptep_get(pvmw->pte); >> >> What I meant to say was, you can pass oldpte from >> remove_migration_pte to this >> function. Basically define old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte) in the >> declarations of >> the start of the while block in remove_migration_pte and remove the >> existing >> one. That will ensure ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration. > > Ah, got it. Thanks for the clarification! > > IIUC, you mean something like this: > > ``` > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > index ce83c2c3c287..bafd8cb3bebe 100644 > --- a/mm/migrate.c > +++ b/mm/migrate.c > @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, > struct list_head *list) > > static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk > *pvmw, > struct folio *folio, > + pte_t old_pte, > unsigned long idx) > { > struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx); > @@ -306,7 +307,7 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct > page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, > return false; > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page); > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page); > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(old_pte), page); > > if (folio_test_mlocked(folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & > VM_LOCKED) || > mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm)) > @@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct > page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, > > newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address), > pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); > + > + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(old_pte)) > + newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte); > + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(old_pte)) > + newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte); > + > set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte); > > dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio)); > @@ -344,7 +351,7 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio, > > while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) { > rmap_t rmap_flags = RMAP_NONE; > - pte_t old_pte; > + pte_t old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte); > pte_t pte; > swp_entry_t entry; > struct page *new; > @@ -365,12 +372,11 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio > *folio, > } > #endif > if (rmap_walk_arg->map_unused_to_zeropage && > - try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, idx)) > + try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, old_pte, idx)) > continue; > > folio_get(folio); > pte = mk_pte(new, READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot)); > - old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte); > > entry = pte_to_swp_entry(old_pte); > if (!is_migration_entry_young(entry)) > ``` > > ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration, right? Yup. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-30 5:29 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-09-30 4:33 [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage Lance Yang 2025-09-30 4:50 ` Dev Jain 2025-09-30 5:22 ` Lance Yang 2025-09-30 5:29 ` Dev Jain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox