* [PATCH] hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list
@ 2025-09-25 14:33 Deepanshu Kartikey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Deepanshu Kartikey @ 2025-09-25 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muchun.song, osalvador, david
Cc: akpm, mike.kravetz, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Deepanshu Kartikey,
syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7
hugetlb_vmdelete_list() uses trylock to acquire VMA locks during truncate
operations. As per the original design in commit 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb:
use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization"), if the trylock fails
or the VMA has no lock, it should skip that VMA. Any remaining mapped
pages are handled by remove_inode_hugepages() which is called after
hugetlb_vmdelete_list() and uses proper lock ordering to guarantee
unmapping success.
Currently, when hugetlb_vma_trylock_write() returns success (1) for VMAs
without shareable locks, the code proceeds to call unmap_hugepage_range().
This causes assertion failures in huge_pmd_unshare() → hugetlb_vma_assert_locked()
because no lock is actually held:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6594 Comm: syz.0.28 Not tainted
Call Trace:
hugetlb_vma_assert_locked+0x1dd/0x250
huge_pmd_unshare+0x2c8/0x540
__unmap_hugepage_range+0x6e3/0x1aa0
unmap_hugepage_range+0x32e/0x410
hugetlb_vmdelete_list+0x189/0x1f0
Fix by explicitly skipping VMAs without shareable locks after trylock
succeeds, consistent with the original design where such VMAs are
deferred to remove_inode_hugepages() for proper handling.
Reported-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f26d7c75c26ec19790e7
Fixes: 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization")
Tested-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
index 9e0625167517..9ba98cab3388 100644
--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -487,7 +487,8 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end,
if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma))
continue;
-
+ if (!__vma_shareable_lock(vma))
+ continue;
v_start = vma_offset_start(vma, start);
v_end = vma_offset_end(vma, end);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list
@ 2025-09-25 14:49 Deepanshu Kartikey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Deepanshu Kartikey @ 2025-09-25 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muchun.song, osalvador, david
Cc: akpm, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Deepanshu Kartikey,
syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7
hugetlb_vmdelete_list() uses trylock to acquire VMA locks during truncate
operations. As per the original design in commit 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb:
use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization"), if the trylock fails
or the VMA has no lock, it should skip that VMA. Any remaining mapped
pages are handled by remove_inode_hugepages() which is called after
hugetlb_vmdelete_list() and uses proper lock ordering to guarantee
unmapping success.
Currently, when hugetlb_vma_trylock_write() returns success (1) for VMAs
without shareable locks, the code proceeds to call unmap_hugepage_range().
This causes assertion failures in huge_pmd_unshare() → hugetlb_vma_assert_locked()
because no lock is actually held:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6594 Comm: syz.0.28 Not tainted
Call Trace:
hugetlb_vma_assert_locked+0x1dd/0x250
huge_pmd_unshare+0x2c8/0x540
__unmap_hugepage_range+0x6e3/0x1aa0
unmap_hugepage_range+0x32e/0x410
hugetlb_vmdelete_list+0x189/0x1f0
Fix by explicitly skipping VMAs without shareable locks after trylock
succeeds, consistent with the original design where such VMAs are
deferred to remove_inode_hugepages() for proper handling.
Reported-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f26d7c75c26ec19790e7
Fixes: 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization")
Tested-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
index 9e0625167517..9ba98cab3388 100644
--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -487,7 +487,8 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end,
if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma))
continue;
-
+ if (!__vma_shareable_lock(vma))
+ continue;
v_start = vma_offset_start(vma, start);
v_end = vma_offset_end(vma, end);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-25 14:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-25 14:33 [PATCH] hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-09-25 14:49 Deepanshu Kartikey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox