From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, usamaarif642@gmail.com,
yuzhao@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
baohua@kernel.org, voidice@gmail.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, kaleshsingh@google.com, npache@redhat.com,
riel@surriel.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, ryncsn@gmail.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, surenb@google.com, hughd@google.com,
willy@infradead.org, matthew.brost@intel.com,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com,
gourry@gourry.net, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com,
Andrew.Yang@mediatek.com, casper.li@mediatek.com,
chinwen.chang@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/thp: fix MTE tag mismatch when replacing zero-filled subpages
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 02:10:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923021043.nx2k4ftzle6e2jht@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250922021458.68123-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:14:58AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>
>When both THP and MTE are enabled, splitting a THP and replacing its
>zero-filled subpages with the shared zeropage can cause MTE tag mismatch
>faults in userspace.
>
>Remapping zero-filled subpages to the shared zeropage is unsafe, as the
>zeropage has a fixed tag of zero, which may not match the tag expected by
>the userspace pointer.
>
>KSM already avoids this problem by using memcmp_pages(), which on arm64
>intentionally reports MTE-tagged pages as non-identical to prevent unsafe
>merging.
>
>As suggested by David[1], this patch adopts the same pattern, replacing the
>memchr_inv() byte-level check with a call to pages_identical(). This
>leverages existing architecture-specific logic to determine if a page is
>truly identical to the shared zeropage.
>
>Having both the THP shrinker and KSM rely on pages_identical() makes the
>design more future-proof, IMO. Instead of handling quirks in generic code,
>we just let the architecture decide what makes two pages identical.
>
>[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca2106a3-4bb2-4457-81af-301fd99fbef4@redhat.com
>
>Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>Reported-by: Qun-wei Lin <Qun-wei.Lin@mediatek.com>
>Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a7944523fcc3634607691c35311a5d59d1a3f8d4.camel@mediatek.com
>Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")
>Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Nice catch.
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 2:14 Lance Yang
2025-09-22 2:36 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-22 3:36 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-22 7:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-22 8:24 ` Usama Arif
2025-09-22 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-22 17:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-23 1:48 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 11:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 12:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-23 12:04 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 12:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 17:20 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 16:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 16:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 2:49 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-24 8:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-24 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 9:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-24 9:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 9:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 2:10 ` Wei Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250923021043.nx2k4ftzle6e2jht@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=Andrew.Yang@mediatek.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=casper.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=chinwen.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=voidice@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox