From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock and its variants
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 16:27:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509201640.ikJun7XS-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb072e71cc39a0ea915347f39f2af29d2e82897f.1758253018.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Hi Qi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20250918]
[also build test ERROR on v6.17-rc6]
[cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything rppt-memblock/for-next rppt-memblock/fixes linus/master v6.17-rc6 v6.17-rc5 v6.17-rc4]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qi-Zheng/mm-thp-replace-folio_memcg-with-folio_memcg_charged/20250919-115219
base: next-20250918
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/eb072e71cc39a0ea915347f39f2af29d2e82897f.1758253018.git.zhengqi.arch%40bytedance.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/4] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock and its variants
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250920 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250920/202509201640.ikJun7XS-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250920/202509201640.ikJun7XS-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509201640.ikJun7XS-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> mm/huge_memory.c:1105:24: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct mem_cgroup'
1105 | queue = memcg ? &memcg->deferred_split_queue :
| ~~~~~^
include/linux/mm_types.h:35:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct mem_cgroup'
35 | struct mem_cgroup;
| ^
mm/huge_memory.c:1119:24: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct mem_cgroup'
1119 | queue = memcg ? &memcg->deferred_split_queue :
| ~~~~~^
include/linux/mm_types.h:35:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct mem_cgroup'
35 | struct mem_cgroup;
| ^
2 errors generated.
vim +1105 mm/huge_memory.c
1098
1099 static struct deferred_split *folio_split_queue_lock(struct folio *folio)
1100 {
1101 struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
1102 struct deferred_split *queue;
1103
1104 memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
> 1105 queue = memcg ? &memcg->deferred_split_queue :
1106 &NODE_DATA(folio_nid(folio))->deferred_split_queue;
1107 spin_lock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
1108
1109 return queue;
1110 }
1111
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-20 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 3:46 [PATCH 0/4] reparent the THP split queue Qi Zheng
2025-09-19 3:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: thp: replace folio_memcg() with folio_memcg_charged() Qi Zheng
2025-09-19 21:30 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-22 8:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-19 3:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock and its variants Qi Zheng
2025-09-19 15:39 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-22 7:56 ` Qi Zheng
2025-09-20 0:49 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-20 8:27 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-09-22 8:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-19 3:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: thp: use folio_batch to handle THP splitting in deferred_split_scan() Qi Zheng
2025-09-22 8:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-22 11:36 ` Qi Zheng
2025-09-19 3:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: thp: reparent the split queue during memcg offline Qi Zheng
2025-09-20 7:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-19 21:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] reparent the THP split queue Shakeel Butt
2025-09-22 7:51 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202509201640.ikJun7XS-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox