From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 17/35] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:59:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918140451.1289454-18-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918140451.1289454-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for rw_semaphore.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v3:
* Switch to DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS() (suggested by Peter)
* __assert -> __assume rename
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 2 +-
include/linux/rwsem.h | 66 ++++++++++++-------
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index 779ecb5ec17a..7a4c2238c910 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`).
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index f1aaf676a874..d2bce28be68b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
* reduce the chance that they will share the same cacheline causing
* cacheline bouncing problem.
*/
-struct rw_semaphore {
+struct_with_capability(rw_semaphore) {
atomic_long_t count;
/*
* Write owner or one of the read owners as well flags regarding
@@ -76,11 +76,13 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __assumes_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE);
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __assumes_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED));
}
@@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
__init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
+ __assume_cap(sem); \
} while (0)
/*
@@ -148,7 +151,7 @@ extern bool is_rwsem_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
#include <linux/rwbase_rt.h>
-struct rw_semaphore {
+struct_with_capability(rw_semaphore) {
struct rwbase_rt rwbase;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
@@ -172,6 +175,7 @@ do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
__init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
+ __assume_cap(sem); \
} while (0)
static __always_inline int rwsem_is_locked(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
@@ -180,11 +184,13 @@ static __always_inline int rwsem_is_locked(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __assumes_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(sem));
}
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __assumes_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!rw_base_is_write_locked(&sem->rwbase));
}
@@ -202,6 +208,7 @@ static __always_inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline void rwsem_assert_held(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __assumes_cap(sem)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
lockdep_assert_held(sem);
@@ -210,6 +217,7 @@ static inline void rwsem_assert_held(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __assumes_cap(sem)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
lockdep_assert_held_write(sem);
@@ -220,48 +228,56 @@ static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for reading
*/
-extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_read_interruptible(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_interruptible(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
/*
* trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
-extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(true, sem);
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires(0, sem);
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
-extern int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires(true, sem);
/*
* release a read lock
*/
-extern void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases_shared(sem);
/*
* release a write lock
*/
-extern void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases(sem);
-DEFINE_GUARD(rwsem_read, struct rw_semaphore *, down_read(_T), up_read(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_read, _try, down_read_trylock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_read, _intr, down_read_interruptible(_T), _RET == 0)
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(rwsem_read, struct rw_semaphore, down_read(_T->lock), up_read(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_read, _try, down_read_trylock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_read, _intr, down_read_interruptible(_T->lock), _RET == 0)
-DEFINE_GUARD(rwsem_write, struct rw_semaphore *, down_write(_T), up_write(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_write, _try, down_write_trylock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_write, _kill, down_write_killable(_T), _RET == 0)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(rwsem_read, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(rwsem_read_try, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(rwsem_read_intr, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(rwsem_write, struct rw_semaphore, down_write(_T->lock), up_write(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_write, _try, down_write_trylock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_write, _kill, down_write_killable(_T->lock), _RET == 0)
+
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(rwsem_write, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(rwsem_write_try, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(rwsem_write_kill, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
/*
* downgrade write lock to read lock
*/
-extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases(sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
/*
@@ -277,11 +293,11 @@ extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
* lockdep_set_class() at lock initialization time.
* See Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst for more details.)
*/
-extern void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern int __must_check down_read_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern int down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern void _down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock);
+extern void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
+extern void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __acquires(sem);
+extern int down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __cond_acquires(0, sem);
+extern void _down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock) __acquires(sem);
# define down_write_nest_lock(sem, nest_lock) \
do { \
@@ -295,8 +311,8 @@ do { \
* [ This API should be avoided as much as possible - the
* proper abstraction for this case is completions. ]
*/
-extern void down_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases_shared(sem);
#else
# define down_read_nested(sem, subclass) down_read(sem)
# define down_read_killable_nested(sem, subclass) down_read_killable(sem)
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 5b17fd94f31e..3c6dad0ba065 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
@@ -255,6 +256,69 @@ static void __used test_seqlock_writer(struct test_seqlock_data *d)
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&d->sl, flags);
}
+struct test_rwsem_data {
+ struct rw_semaphore sem;
+ int counter __guarded_by(&sem);
+};
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_init(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ init_rwsem(&d->sem);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_reader(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ down_read(&d->sem);
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+
+ if (down_read_trylock(&d->sem)) {
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_writer(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ down_write(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+ up_write(&d->sem);
+
+ down_write(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+ downgrade_write(&d->sem);
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+
+ if (down_write_trylock(&d->sem)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ up_write(&d->sem);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_assert(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_guard(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ { guard(rwsem_read)(&d->sem); (void)d->counter; }
+ { guard(rwsem_write)(&d->sem); d->counter++; }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_cond_guard(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ scoped_cond_guard(rwsem_read_try, return, &d->sem) {
+ (void)d->counter;
+ }
+ scoped_cond_guard(rwsem_write_try, return, &d->sem) {
+ d->counter++;
+ }
+}
+
struct test_bit_spinlock_data {
unsigned long bits;
int counter __guarded_by(__bitlock(3, &bits));
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 13:59 [PATCH v3 00/35] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/35] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 15:58 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-18 16:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-18 16:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/35] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/35] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-09-18 20:36 ` Joe Perches
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/35] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/35] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/35] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/35] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/35] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/35] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/35] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/35] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/35] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/35] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/35] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 19/35] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 20/35] locking/ww_mutex: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/35] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 25/35] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 26/35] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 27/35] kfence: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 28/35] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 29/35] kcsan: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 30/35] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 31/35] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 32/35] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 33/35] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 34/35] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 35/35] sched: Enable capability analysis for core.c and fair.c Marco Elver
2025-09-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/35] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-18 14:30 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-18 17:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-18 19:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-19 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-19 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-22 9:33 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-22 17:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-23 19:49 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-19 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-22 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-20 10:23 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-20 12:44 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 15:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-09-18 21:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-09-19 9:10 ` Marco Elver
2025-11-13 14:30 ` Marco Elver
2025-11-14 4:38 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-14 13:22 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 16:21 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-18 19:41 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-09-19 7:05 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250918140451.1289454-18-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox