From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Need advice with iput() deadlock during writeback
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 22:10:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250917211009.GE39973@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKPOu+8wLezQY05ZLSd4P2OySe7qqE7CTHzYG6pobpt=xV--Jg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:36:48PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:34 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Suppose two threads do umount() on two different filesystems. The first
> > one to flush picks *everything* you've delayed and starts handling that.
> > The second sees nothing to do and proceeds to taking the filesystem
> > it's unmounting apart, right under the nose of the first thread doing
> > work on both filesystems...
>
> Each filesystem (struct ceph_fs_client) has its own inode_wq.
Yes, but
if (llist_add(&ci->async_llist, &delayed_ceph_iput_list))
schedule_delayed_work(&delayed_ceph_iput_work, 1);
won't have anything to do with that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 8:07 Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 8:23 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-09-17 8:38 ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 8:59 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-09-17 9:20 ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 9:32 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-09-17 12:48 ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 20:14 ` Al Viro
2025-09-17 20:19 ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 20:29 ` Al Viro
2025-09-17 20:32 ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 20:23 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-09-17 20:34 ` Al Viro
2025-09-17 20:36 ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 21:10 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-09-17 21:19 ` Max Kellermann
2025-09-17 21:20 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-09-17 20:39 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-09-17 21:02 ` Al Viro
2025-09-17 21:18 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-09-17 21:42 ` Al Viro
2025-09-17 22:58 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250917211009.GE39973@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox