From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] slab: Remove dead code in free_consistency_checks()
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250915-slub-slab-validation-v2-1-314690fc1532@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915-slub-slab-validation-v2-0-314690fc1532@suse.cz>
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
We already know that slab is a valid slab as that's checked by the
caller. In the future, we won't be able to get to a slab pointer
from a non-slab page.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
mm/slub.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 3062f56bf49882538ba5af407de9f69c451f2e29..56143bfd1ae319d384981c810a5ed84af00f4afa 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1684,10 +1684,7 @@ static inline int free_consistency_checks(struct kmem_cache *s,
return 0;
if (unlikely(s != slab->slab_cache)) {
- if (!folio_test_slab(slab_folio(slab))) {
- slab_err(s, slab, "Attempt to free object(0x%p) outside of slab",
- object);
- } else if (!slab->slab_cache) {
+ if (!slab->slab_cache) {
slab_err(NULL, slab, "No slab cache for object 0x%p",
object);
} else {
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] slab: struct slab pointer validation improvements Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 13:55 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-09-15 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] slab: wrap debug slab validation in validate_slab_ptr() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] slab: move validate_slab_ptr() from check_slab() to its callers Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] slab: move validate_slab_ptr() from alloc_consistency_checks() to its caller Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] slab: validate slab before using it in alloc_single_from_partial() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 14:25 ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-15 14:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] slab: don't validate slab pointer in free_debug_processing() Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250915-slub-slab-validation-v2-1-314690fc1532@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox