From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] slab: validate slab before using it in alloc_single_from_partial()
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:02:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250911-slub-slab-validation-v1-5-8b67eb3b3dc5@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911-slub-slab-validation-v1-0-8b67eb3b3dc5@suse.cz>
We touch slab->freelist and slab->inuse before checking the slab pointer
is actually sane. Do that validation first, which will be safer. We can
thus also remove the check from alloc_debug_processing().
This adds a new "s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS" test but
alloc_single_from_partial() is only called for caches with debugging
enabled so it's acceptable.
In alloc_single_from_new_slab() we just created the struct slab and call
alloc_debug_processing() to mainly set up redzones, tracking etc, while
not really expecting the consistency checks to fail. Thus don't validate
it there.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
mm/slub.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 909c71372a2f542b6e0d67c12ea683133b246b66..93df6e82af37c798c3fa5574c9d825f0f4a83013 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1651,11 +1651,6 @@ static noinline bool alloc_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
struct slab *slab, void *object, int orig_size)
{
if (s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS) {
- if (!validate_slab_ptr(slab)) {
- slab_err(s, slab, "Not a valid slab page");
- return false;
- }
-
if (!alloc_consistency_checks(s, slab, object))
goto bad;
}
@@ -2825,15 +2820,19 @@ static void *alloc_single_from_partial(struct kmem_cache *s,
lockdep_assert_held(&n->list_lock);
+ if (s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS) {
+ if (!validate_slab_ptr(slab)) {
+ slab_err(s, slab, "Not a valid slab page");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
object = slab->freelist;
slab->freelist = get_freepointer(s, object);
slab->inuse++;
- if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, slab, object, orig_size)) {
- if (validate_slab_ptr(slab))
- remove_partial(n, slab);
+ if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, slab, object, orig_size))
return NULL;
- }
if (slab->inuse == slab->objects) {
remove_partial(n, slab);
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-11 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-11 17:02 [PATCH 0/6] slab: struct slab pointer validation improvements Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: Remove dead code in free_consistency_checks() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] slab: wrap debug slab validation in validate_slab_ptr() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:20 ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] slab: move validate_slab_ptr() from check_slab() to its callers Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:24 ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] slab: move validate_slab_ptr() from alloc_consistency_checks() to its caller Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:41 ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-11 17:02 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-09-12 10:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] slab: validate slab before using it in alloc_single_from_partial() Harry Yoo
2025-09-12 11:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-11 17:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] slab: don't validate slab pointer in free_debug_processing() Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-12 10:52 ` Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250911-slub-slab-validation-v1-5-8b67eb3b3dc5@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox