From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: zswap: interact directly with zsmalloc
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 16:01:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250909150156.GB1474@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <r3dzlbqyvhaho5zuac7eba6pxz47zy3cz4lopxza3ls3ibadlh@6evm5aryyuxp>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 06:53:15PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 05:15:26PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > zswap goes through the zpool layer to enable runtime-switching of
> > allocator backends for compressed data. However, since zbud and z3fold
> > were removed in 6.15, zsmalloc has been the only option available.
> >
> > As such, the zpool indirection is unnecessary. Make zswap deal with
> > zsmalloc directly. This is comparable to zram, which also directly
> > interacts with zsmalloc and has never supported a different backend.
> >
> > Note that this does not preclude future improvements and experiments
> > with different allocation strategies. Should it become necessary, it's
> > possible to provide an alternate implementation for the zsmalloc API,
> > selectable at compile time. However, zsmalloc is also rather mature
> > and feature rich, with years of widespread production exposure; it's
> > encouraged to make incremental improvements rather than fork it.
> >
> > In any case, the complexity of runtime pluggability seems excessive
> > and unjustified at this time. Switch zswap to zsmalloc to remove the
> > last user of the zpool API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > ---
> [..]
> > @@ -315,52 +292,29 @@ static struct zswap_pool *zswap_pool_create(char *type, char *compressor)
> > error:
> > if (pool->acomp_ctx)
> > free_percpu(pool->acomp_ctx);
> > - if (pool->zpool)
> > - zpool_destroy_pool(pool->zpool);
> > + if (pool->zs_pool)
> > + zs_destroy_pool(pool->zs_pool);
> > kfree(pool);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > static struct zswap_pool *__zswap_pool_create_fallback(void)
> > {
> > - bool has_comp, has_zpool;
> > -
> > - has_comp = crypto_has_acomp(zswap_compressor, 0, 0);
> > - if (!has_comp && strcmp(zswap_compressor,
> > - CONFIG_ZSWAP_COMPRESSOR_DEFAULT)) {
> > + if (!crypto_has_acomp(zswap_compressor, 0, 0) &&
> > + strcmp(zswap_compressor, CONFIG_ZSWAP_COMPRESSOR_DEFAULT)) {
> > pr_err("compressor %s not available, using default %s\n",
> > zswap_compressor, CONFIG_ZSWAP_COMPRESSOR_DEFAULT);
> > param_free_charp(&zswap_compressor);
> > zswap_compressor = CONFIG_ZSWAP_COMPRESSOR_DEFAULT;
> > - has_comp = crypto_has_acomp(zswap_compressor, 0, 0);
> > - }
> > - if (!has_comp) {
> > - pr_err("default compressor %s not available\n",
> > - zswap_compressor);
> > - param_free_charp(&zswap_compressor);
> > - zswap_compressor = ZSWAP_PARAM_UNSET;
> > - }
> > -
> > - has_zpool = zpool_has_pool(zswap_zpool_type);
> > - if (!has_zpool && strcmp(zswap_zpool_type,
> > - CONFIG_ZSWAP_ZPOOL_DEFAULT)) {
> > - pr_err("zpool %s not available, using default %s\n",
> > - zswap_zpool_type, CONFIG_ZSWAP_ZPOOL_DEFAULT);
> > - param_free_charp(&zswap_zpool_type);
> > - zswap_zpool_type = CONFIG_ZSWAP_ZPOOL_DEFAULT;
> > - has_zpool = zpool_has_pool(zswap_zpool_type);
> > - }
> > - if (!has_zpool) {
> > - pr_err("default zpool %s not available\n",
> > - zswap_zpool_type);
> > - param_free_charp(&zswap_zpool_type);
> > - zswap_zpool_type = ZSWAP_PARAM_UNSET;
> > + if (!crypto_has_acomp(zswap_compressor, 0, 0)) {
> > + pr_err("default compressor %s not available\n",
> > + zswap_compressor);
> > + zswap_compressor = ZSWAP_PARAM_UNSET;
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
>
> Hmm it seems like there may be a change of behavior here. If
> zswap_compressor == CONFIG_ZSWAP_COMPRESSOR_DEFAULT at the beginning and
> crypto_has_acomp() returns false, the old code will go into the second
> if (!has_comp) block, printing an error, freeing the string, and setting
> zswap_compressor to ZSWAP_PARAM_UNSET, then we eventually return NULL.
>
> It seems like the new code will just call zswap_pool_create() anyway.
>
> Am I missing something here?
I don't think that scenario is possible, due to the way the Kconfig
works. Whatever backend I select for CONFIG_ZSWAP_COMPRESSOR_DEFAULT
pulls in the crypto module as built-in/=y. It should always be there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 16:15 [PATCH 0/3] mm: remove zpool Johannes Weiner
2025-08-29 16:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: zswap: interact directly with zsmalloc Johannes Weiner
2025-09-05 18:53 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-09 15:01 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2025-09-09 20:10 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-10 13:42 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-11 14:30 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-15 15:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-15 19:33 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-08-29 16:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: remove unused zpool layer Johannes Weiner
2025-08-29 19:07 ` SeongJae Park
2025-09-09 15:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-10 3:14 ` SeongJae Park
2025-09-05 18:58 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-09 15:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-09 20:08 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-09 20:09 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-10 13:46 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-08-29 16:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: zpdesc: minor naming and comment corrections Johannes Weiner
2025-09-05 19:05 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-09 15:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-09 20:08 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-04 9:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: remove zpool Vitaly Wool
2025-09-04 10:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-04 11:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-05 5:36 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-04 14:11 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-05 7:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-05 18:02 ` Nhat Pham
2025-09-05 22:42 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-05 19:57 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-06 5:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-09-08 12:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-09-09 20:12 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-13 13:55 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-15 19:37 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-16 11:16 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-16 3:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-09-04 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-05 5:42 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-05 18:30 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-05 22:20 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-04 9:51 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-09-05 17:52 ` Nhat Pham
2025-09-05 19:45 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-09-05 21:35 ` Nhat Pham
2025-09-09 15:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-09 20:11 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250909150156.GB1474@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox