Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/mm: uffd-stress fixes

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:52:05 +0530 Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> wrote:

> 
> On 26/08/25 12:37 pm, Dev Jain wrote:
> > This patchset ensures that the number of hugepages is correctly set in the
> > system so that the uffd-stress test does not fail due to the racy nature of
> > the test. Patch 1 corrects the hugepage constraint in the run_vmtests.sh
> > script, whereas patch 2 corrects the constraint in the test itself.
> >
> > Dev Jain (2):
> >    selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Make test operate on less hugetlb memory
> >    selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Stricten constraint on free hugepages before
> >      the test
> >
> >   tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +-
> >   tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c  | 2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I wanted to make a v2 of this series to replace 10 with min(32, nrcpus - 1)

That sounds line a one-line change?  Send a one-line change ;)

> (see computation of nr_parallel in uffd-stress.c) but I see that it has
> been pulled into mm-new, and on top of that, the following patch makes
> things complicated to just revert my commits in mm-new and make v2 on top of that -
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250830033424.8C44FC4CEF0@smtp.kernel.org/
> 
> So shall I just send a new separate patch based off mm-new?

Or just resend the whole series based on mainline or something?