From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] arm64: mm: fully support nested lazy_mmu sections
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:57:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250904125736.3918646-4-kevin.brodsky@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904125736.3918646-1-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Despite recent efforts to prevent lazy_mmu sections from nesting, it
remains difficult to ensure that it never occurs - and in fact it
does occur on arm64 in certain situations (CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC).
Commit 1ef3095b1405 ("arm64/mm: Permit lazy_mmu_mode to be nested")
made nesting tolerable on arm64, but without truly supporting it:
the inner leave() call clears TIF_LAZY_MMU, disabling the batching
optimisation before the outer section ends.
Now that the lazy_mmu API allows enter() to pass through a state to
the matching leave() call, we can actually support nesting. If
enter() is called inside an active lazy_mmu section, TIF_LAZY_MMU
will already be set, and we can then return LAZY_MMU_NESTED to
instruct the matching leave() call not to clear TIF_LAZY_MMU.
The only effect of this patch is to ensure that TIF_LAZY_MMU (and
therefore the batching optimisation) remains set until the outermost
lazy_mmu section ends. leave() still emits barriers if needed,
regardless of the nesting level, as the caller may expect any
page table changes to become visible when leave() returns.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 19 +++++--------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 816197d08165..602feda97dc4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -85,24 +85,14 @@ typedef int lazy_mmu_state_t;
static inline lazy_mmu_state_t arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
{
- /*
- * lazy_mmu_mode is not supposed to permit nesting. But in practice this
- * does happen with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, where a page allocation
- * inside a lazy_mmu_mode section (such as zap_pte_range()) will change
- * permissions on the linear map with apply_to_page_range(), which
- * re-enters lazy_mmu_mode. So we tolerate nesting in our
- * implementation. The first call to arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() will
- * flush and clear the flag such that the remainder of the work in the
- * outer nest behaves as if outside of lazy mmu mode. This is safe and
- * keeps tracking simple.
- */
+ int lazy_mmu_nested;
if (in_interrupt())
return LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
- set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
+ lazy_mmu_nested = test_and_set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
- return LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
+ return lazy_mmu_nested ? LAZY_MMU_NESTED : LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
}
static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(lazy_mmu_state_t state)
@@ -113,7 +103,8 @@ static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(lazy_mmu_state_t state)
if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING))
emit_pte_barriers();
- clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
+ if (state != LAZY_MMU_NESTED)
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-04 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 12:57 [PATCH 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: remove arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: introduce local state for lazy_mmu sections Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 15:06 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-04 15:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 17:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-04 22:14 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-05 11:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-05 12:22 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-04 12:57 ` Kevin Brodsky [this message]
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/xen: support nested lazy_mmu sections (again) Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 15:48 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-08 7:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/mm: support nested lazy_mmu sections Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 15:52 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-08 7:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 6/7] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: update lazy_mmu documentation Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-05 9:46 ` [PATCH 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-05 12:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250904125736.3918646-4-kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--to=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox