linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: clang-22 -Walloc-size in mm/kfence/kfence_test.c in 6.6 and 6.1
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 11:48:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250903184831.GA3004824@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNNV=ZmjcGWvPwHz+To6qVE4s=SY0CrcXFbizMeBrBaX4g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> It should be silenced. I'm surprised that they'd e.g. warn about
> malloc(0), which is well defined, and in the kernel, we also have
> 0-sized kmalloc (incl krealloc) allocations being well-defined. As
> long as the returned pointer isn't used, there's no UB. I guess doing
> an explicit 0-sized alloc is not something anyone should do normally I
> guess, so the warning ought to prevent that, but in the test case we
> explicitly want that.

Heh, just as I was looking at silencing this, I noticed a change to the
warning yesterday that explicitly silences it for 0-sized allocations
based on other feedback from the original thread, which I should have
noticed.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5f38548c86c3e7bbfce3a739245d8f999e9946b5

So there is nothing to do here now, thanks for the input regardless!

Cheers,
Nathan


      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-03 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-03  0:07 Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-03  3:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-09-03  6:00 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-03 18:48   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250903184831.GA3004824@ax162 \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox