From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
david@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: directly add pagesize instead of increase until page size
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:46:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250830074627.pitdp64svss6slyk@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829200953.1757e85542b1126c4881d600@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 08:09:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 02:31:02 +0000 Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The check of is_backed_by_folio() is done on each page.
>>
>> Directly move pointer to next page instead of increase one and check if
>> it is page size aligned.
>
>Why?
>
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>> @@ -423,9 +423,8 @@ static void split_pte_mapped_thp(void)
>>
>> /* smap does not show THPs after mremap, use kpageflags instead */
>> thp_size = 0;
>> - for (i = 0; i < pagesize * 4; i++)
>> - if (i % pagesize == 0 &&
>> - is_backed_by_folio(&pte_mapped[i], pmd_order, pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd))
>> + for (i = 0; i < pagesize * 4; i += pagesize)
>> + if (is_backed_by_folio(&pte_mapped[i], pmd_order, pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd))
>> thp_size++;
>
>Looks like we're doing more work. Is there something wrong with the
>existing code?
Excuse me if I misunderstand the code.
Originally, i iterate from 0 to pagesize * 4 one by one and call
is_backed_by_folio() when i is 0, 4096, 8192, 12288.
The change makes i just iterate on 0, 4096, 8192, 12288 and call
is_backed_by_folio() respectively.
Current code is not wrong, but not necessary to iterate one by one.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-30 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-30 2:31 Wei Yang
2025-08-30 3:09 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-30 7:46 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2025-08-31 1:32 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-31 2:17 ` Wei Yang
2025-09-01 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 12:51 ` Wei Yang
2025-09-01 12:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250830074627.pitdp64svss6slyk@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox