[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Harmonize should_compact_retry() type

[Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>]

Currently order is signed in one version of the function and unsigned in
the other. Tidy that up.

In page_alloc.c, order is unsigned in the vast majority of cases. But,
there is a cluster of exceptions in compaction-related code (probably
stemming from the fact that compact_control.order is signed). So, prefer
local consistency and make this one signed too.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index d1d037f97c5fc76f8a7739e8515d7593e0ad44f9..8faa0ad9f461fbe151ec347e331d83c2fdc8cad2 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4182,7 +4182,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 }
 
 static inline bool
-should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
+should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, int alloc_flags,
 		     enum compact_result compact_result,
 		     enum compact_priority *compact_priority,
 		     int *compaction_retries)

---
base-commit: fab1beda7597fac1cecc01707d55eadb6bbe773c
change-id: 20250826-cleanup-should_compact_retry-9c6b5cdf8d27

Best regards,
-- 
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>