linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	honggyu.kim@sk.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/damon/core: set quota->charged_from to jiffies at first charge window
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:58:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250821155833.57597-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABFDxMHgOPt5zx3q=KRxGGfp86R4V0AgO+FrHDftqLYoG20BWw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:06:58 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 2:41 PM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
[...]
> > Let's restart.  Could you please rewrite the commit log for this patch and send
> > the draft as a reply to this?
> >
> > We can further discuss on the new draft if it has more things to improve.  And
> > once the discussion is finalized, you can post v4 of this patch with the
> > updated commit message.
> 
> Good Idea. This is the draft for commit message. Also, Thank you for
> your patience and understanding.

Thank you for accepting my humble suggestion.

> 
> Kernel initialize "jiffies" timer as 5 minutes below zero, as shown in
> include/linux/jiffies.h
> 
> /*
>  * Have the 32 bit jiffies value wrap 5 minutes after boot
>  * so jiffies wrap bugs show up earlier.
>  */
>  #define INITIAL_JIFFIES ((unsigned long)(unsigned int) (-300*HZ))
> 
> And jiffies comparison help functions cast unsigned value to signed to
> cover wraparound
> 
>  #define time_after_eq(a,b) \
>   (typecheck(unsigned long, a) && \
>   typecheck(unsigned long, b) && \
>   ((long)((a) - (b)) >= 0))
> 
> When quota->charged_from is initialized to 0, time_after_eq() can incorrectly
> return FALSE even after reset_interval has elapsed. This occurs when
> (jiffies - reset_interval) produces a value with MSB=1, which is interpreted
> as negative in signed arithmetic.
> 
> This issue primarily affects 32-bit systems because:
> On 64-bit systems: MSB=1 values occur after ~292 million years from boot
> (assuming HZ=1000), almost impossible.
> 
> On 32-bit systems: MSB=1 values occur during the first 5 minutes after boot,
> and the second half of every jiffies wraparound cycle, starting from day 25
> (assuming HZ=1000)
> 
> When above unexpected FALSE return from time_after_eq() occurs, the
> charging window will not reset. The user impact depends on esz value
> at that time.
> 
> If esz is 0, scheme ignores configured quotas and runs without any
> limits.
> 
> If esz is not 0, scheme stops working once the quota is exhausted. It
> remains until the charging window finally resets.
> 
> So, change quota->charged_from to jiffies at damos_adjust_quota() when
> it is considered as the first charge window. By this change, we can avoid
> unexpected FALSE return from time_after_eq()

This new draft looks good to me.  I find nothing to further modify.  Could you
please send v3 of this patch with the above commit log?


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-21 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-19 15:01 Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-19 17:27 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-19 18:03   ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-20 13:18   ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-20 18:27     ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21  1:08       ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21  2:54         ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21  4:29           ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21  4:43             ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21  5:41             ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21  5:43               ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 11:06               ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21 15:58                 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-08-21 16:18                   ` Sang-Heon Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250821155833.57597-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox