From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/mm_init: use deferred_init_memmap_chunk() in deferred_grow_zone()
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:52:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250819095223.ckjdsii4gc6u4nec@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818064615.505641-2-rppt@kernel.org>
Hi, Mike
After going through the code again, I have some trivial thoughts to discuss
with you. If not right, please let me know.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 09:46:12AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
[...]
> bool __init deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
> {
>- unsigned long nr_pages_needed = ALIGN(1 << order, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>+ unsigned long nr_pages_needed = SECTION_ALIGN_UP(1 << order);
> pg_data_t *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
> unsigned long first_deferred_pfn = pgdat->first_deferred_pfn;
> unsigned long spfn, epfn, flags;
> unsigned long nr_pages = 0;
>- u64 i = 0;
>
> /* Only the last zone may have deferred pages */
> if (zone_end_pfn(zone) != pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat))
>@@ -2262,37 +2272,26 @@ bool __init deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
> return true;
> }
In the file above this line, there is a compare between first_deferred_pfn and
its original value after grab pgdat_resize_lock.
I am thinking to compare first_deferred_pfn with ULONG_MAX, as it compared in
deferred_init_memmap(). This indicate this zone has already been initialized
totally.
Current code guard this by spfn < zone_end_pfn(zone). Maybe a check ahead
would be more clear?
>
>- /* If the zone is empty somebody else may have cleared out the zone */
>- if (!deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn,
>- first_deferred_pfn)) {
>- pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = ULONG_MAX;
>- pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
>- /* Retry only once. */
>- return first_deferred_pfn != ULONG_MAX;
>+ /*
>+ * Initialize at least nr_pages_needed in section chunks.
>+ * If a section has less free memory than nr_pages_needed, the next
>+ * section will be also initalized.
>+ * Note, that it still does not guarantee that allocation of order can
>+ * be satisfied if the sections are fragmented because of memblock
>+ * allocations.
>+ */
>+ for (spfn = first_deferred_pfn, epfn = SECTION_ALIGN_UP(spfn + 1);
I am expecting first_deferred_pfn is section aligned. So epfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION
is fine?
Maybe I missed something.
>+ nr_pages < nr_pages_needed && spfn < zone_end_pfn(zone);
>+ spfn = epfn, epfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>+ nr_pages += deferred_init_memmap_chunk(spfn, epfn, zone);
> }
>
> /*
>- * Initialize and free pages in MAX_PAGE_ORDER sized increments so
>- * that we can avoid introducing any issues with the buddy
>- * allocator.
>+ * There were no pages to initialize and free which means the zone's
>+ * memory map is completely initialized.
> */
>- while (spfn < epfn) {
>- /* update our first deferred PFN for this section */
>- first_deferred_pfn = spfn;
>-
>- nr_pages += deferred_init_maxorder(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn);
>- touch_nmi_watchdog();
>-
>- /* We should only stop along section boundaries */
>- if ((first_deferred_pfn ^ spfn) < PAGES_PER_SECTION)
>- continue;
>-
>- /* If our quota has been met we can stop here */
>- if (nr_pages >= nr_pages_needed)
>- break;
>- }
>+ pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = nr_pages ? spfn : ULONG_MAX;
If we come here because spfn >= zone_end_pfn(zone), first_deferred_pfn is left
a "valid" value and deferred_init_memmap() will try to do its job. But
actually nothing left to initialize.
For this case, I suggest to set it ULONG_MAX too. But this is really corner
case.
>
>- pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = spfn;
> pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
>
> return nr_pages > 0;
>--
>2.50.1
>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-18 6:46 [PATCH 0/4] mm/mm_init: simplify deferred init of struct pages Mike Rapoport
2025-08-18 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/mm_init: use deferred_init_memmap_chunk() in deferred_grow_zone() Mike Rapoport
2025-08-19 7:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-19 9:52 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2025-08-19 10:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-19 23:51 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-20 9:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-20 12:42 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-18 6:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/mm_init: deferred_init_memmap: use a job per zone Mike Rapoport
2025-08-19 7:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-18 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/mm_init: drop deferred_init_maxorder() Mike Rapoport
2025-08-19 7:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-19 9:22 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-19 10:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-19 12:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-18 6:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] memblock: drop for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from() Mike Rapoport
2025-08-19 7:39 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm/mm_init: simplify deferred init of struct pages Wei Yang
2025-08-19 10:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-22 5:54 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250819095223.ckjdsii4gc6u4nec@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox