linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Gu Bowen <gubowen5@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Lu Jialin <lujialin4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Fix possible deadlock in console_trylock_spinning
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:56:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025081450-tibia-angelfish-3aa2@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJ3f05Dqzx0OouJa@arm.com>

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 02:08:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:33:56AM +0800, Gu Bowen wrote:
> > On 8/14/2025 6:56 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I'm not sure which kernel version this was against, but kmemleak.c has
> > > changed quite a lot.
> > > 
> > > Could we please see a patch against a latest kernel version?  Linus
> > > mainline will suit.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > I discovered this issue in kernel version 5.10. Afterwards, I reviewed the
> > code of the mainline version and found that this deadlock path no longer
> > exists due to the refactoring of console_lock in v6.2-rc1. For details on
> > the refactoring, you can refer to this link :
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221116162152.193147-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de/.
> > Therefore, theoretically, this issue existed before the refactoring of
> > console_lock.
> 
> Oh, so you can no longer hit this issue with mainline. This wasn't
> mentioned (or I missed it) in the commit log.
> 
> So this would be a stable-only fix that does not have a correspondent
> upstream. Adding Greg for his opinion.

Why not take the upstream changes instead?


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-14 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-13  8:53 Gu Bowen
2025-08-13 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-13 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-14  2:33   ` Gu Bowen
2025-08-14 13:08     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-14 13:56       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-08-14 14:38         ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-14 14:54           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-14 17:00             ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-18  2:24       ` Gu Bowen
2025-08-18  5:54         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025081450-tibia-angelfish-3aa2@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gubowen5@huawei.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox