linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	kernel-dev@igalia.com,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>,
	Helen Koike <koike@igalia.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: only set ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC for __GPF_HIGH allocations
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:22:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814172245.1259625-1-cascardo@igalia.com> (raw)

Commit 524c48072e56 ("mm/page_alloc: rename ALLOC_HIGH to
ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE") is the start of a series that explains how __GFP_HIGH,
which implies ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE, is going to be used instead of
__GFP_ATOMIC for high atomic reserves.

Commit eb2e2b425c69 ("mm/page_alloc: explicitly record high-order atomic
allocations in alloc_flags") introduced ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC for such
allocations of order higher than 0. It still used __GFP_ATOMIC, though.

Then, commit 1ebbb21811b7 ("mm/page_alloc: explicitly define how __GFP_HIGH
non-blocking allocations accesses reserves") just turned that check for
!__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, ignoring that high atomic reserves were expected to
test for __GFP_HIGH.

This leads to high atomic reserves being added for high-order GFP_NOWAIT
allocations and others that clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, which is
unexpected. Later, those reserves lead to 0-order allocations going to the
slow path and starting reclaim.

From /proc/pagetypeinfo, without the patch:

Node    0, zone      DMA, type   HighAtomic      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0
Node    0, zone    DMA32, type   HighAtomic      1      8     10      9      7      3      0      0      0      0      0
Node    0, zone   Normal, type   HighAtomic     64     20     12      5      0      0      0      0      0      0      0

With the patch:

Node    0, zone      DMA, type   HighAtomic      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0
Node    0, zone    DMA32, type   HighAtomic      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0
Node    0, zone   Normal, type   HighAtomic      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0

Fixes: 1ebbb21811b7 ("mm/page_alloc: explicitly define how __GFP_HIGH non-blocking allocations accesses reserves")
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
Tested-by: Helen Koike <koike@igalia.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 2ef3c07266b3..bf52e3bef626 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4219,7 +4219,7 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) {
 			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NON_BLOCK;
 
-			if (order > 0)
+			if (order > 0 && (alloc_flags & ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE))
 				alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC;
 		}
 
-- 
2.47.2



             reply	other threads:[~2025-08-14 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-14 17:22 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [this message]
2025-08-14 20:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-08-14 20:34   ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2025-08-28  5:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-08-29  6:41 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-29  8:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-29  8:38   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-29  8:56     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-08-29  9:30       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-29 10:30         ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250814172245.1259625-1-cascardo@igalia.com \
    --to=cascardo@igalia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=koike@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox